Organisation paid for research Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

The Regents of the University of Minnesota

Neither a doctor nor a teaching hospital

Research payments

$1,991,830

628 payments

Through program year 2025, The Regents of the University of Minnesota is reported as receiving $1,991,830 in research payments, across 628 payments.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $216,141 187
2024 Research $215,035 102
2023 Research $351,642 57
2022 Research $309,147 48
2021 Research $161,892 99
2020 Research $225,141 80
2019 Research $512,832 55

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. LivaNova USA, Inc. $677,824 252 payments
  2. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $264,919 74 payments
  3. Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. $224,828 174 payments
  4. Celgene Corporation $206,689 6 payments
  5. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $91,985 3 payments
  6. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $84,331 8 payments
  7. Swedish Orphan Biovitrum AB $73,667 6 payments
  8. Ascendis Pharma, Inc. $70,411 16 payments
  9. Mirati Therapeutics, Inc. $61,802 12 payments
  10. Biogen, Inc. $49,790 1 payment
Studies the money was for Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. A Prospective, Multi-center, Randomized Controlled Blinded Trial Demonstrating the Safety and Effectiveness of VNS Therapy System as Adjunctive Therapy Versus a No Stimulation Control in Subjects With Treatment-Resistant Depression (RECOVER) $242,735 31 payments
  2. Recover $166,564 171 payments
  3. A Prospective, Multi-center, Randomized Controlled Blinded Trial Demonstrating the Safety and Effectiveness of VNS Therapy System as Adjunctive Therapy Versus a No Stimulation Control in Subjects With Treatment-Resistant Depression $157,960 39 payments
  4. A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Varying Doses and Dose Regimens of Evinacumab in Patients With Persistent Hypercholesterolemia Despite Maximally Tolerated Lipid Modifying Therapy $147,994 44 payments
  5. The RECOVERsUb-study, Which Leverages quaNtitative and Credible Research tOols From Verily, Will providE Assessment measuRes for Depressive Episodes $98,140 7 payments
  6. A Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of JCAR017 to Standard of Care in Adult Subjects With High-risk, Transplant-eligible Relapsed or Refractory Aggressive B-cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas (TRANSFORM) (JCAR017-BCM-003) $79,730 1 payment
  7. Ni-0501-14 $73,667 6 payments
  8. PhIII Yellowstone Induction Study # 2 OZANIMOD in Moderate to Severe CD (RPC01-3202) (BMS Study Number: IM047-P15) (RPC01-3202) $72,032 2 payments
  9. MEDI9197 TLR7-8 Solid Tmr-D6410C00001 Phase 1 FTIH of MEDI-9197 in $71,924 1 payment
  10. Safety, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Efficacy of Migalastat in Pediatric Subjects (Aged 12 to <18 Years) $70,088 83 payments
What the money was spent on Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Non-patient care $49,854 6 payments
  2. Overhead $16,215 2 payments
  3. Other $12,565 8 payments
  4. Patient care $11,987 7 payments

Only reported on some payments, and a payment can report more than one category, so these amounts overlap.

What you are looking at

A noncovered recipient is an organisation paid for research that is neither an individual clinician nor a teaching hospital — typically a contract research organisation, a foundation or a trial site network. They receive 81% of all reported research money, which is why they appear here at all.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record