Organisation paid for research Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

The Medical College of Wisconsin, Inc.

Neither a doctor nor a teaching hospital

Research payments

$13,779,748

1,221 payments

Through program year 2025, The Medical College of Wisconsin, Inc. is reported as receiving $13,779,748 in research payments, across 1,221 payments.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $5,429,625 310
2024 Research $2,975,490 377
2023 Research $2,177,340 218
2022 Research $799,186 108
2021 Research $514,966 55
2020 Research $1,045,508 67
2019 Research $837,634 86

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. BeiGene, Ltd. $3,613,629 250 payments
  2. Genentech, Inc. $2,574,981 271 payments
  3. BeOne Medicines Ltd. $2,225,049 36 payments
  4. BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. $2,191,860 259 payments
  5. Roche Products Limited $492,097 30 payments
  6. United Therapeutics Corporation $448,893 125 payments
  7. ADC Therapeutics America, Inc. $295,419 53 payments
  8. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $295,296 3 payments
  9. Jazz Pharmaceuticals Inc. $254,059 2 payments
  10. F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG $231,981 7 payments
Studies the money was for Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. A Phase 3, Open-Label, Randomized Study of Sonrotoclax (BGB-11417) Plus Zanubrutinib (BGB-3111) Compared With Venetoclax Plus Obinutuzumab in Patients With Previously Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia $4,431,600 68 payments
  2. A Phase 1b/2 Dose-Escalation and Cohort-Expansion Study to Determine the Safety and Efficacy of BGB-11417as Monotherapy, in Combination With Dexamethasone, Dexamethasone/Carfilzomib, Dexamethasone/Daratumumab, and Dexamethasone/Pomalidomide in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma and t(11;14) $691,904 122 payments
  3. A Phase 2 Open-Label Long-Term Extension Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of BMN 111 in Children with Achondroplasia $630,658 69 payments
  4. A Phase III Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Fenebrutinib in Adults With Progressive Ms $574,192 30 payments
  5. Ph1b 2 TDB Pola Dose Escalation in R R NHL Ph1b Followed By Expansion in R R Dlbcl and R R FL Ph2 $514,779 31 payments
  6. Morpheus Pancreatic $492,097 30 payments
  7. A Phase 1b/2, Open-Label, Dose Finding, and Expansion Study of the Bcl-2 Inhibitor BGB-11417 in Patients With Myeloid Malignancies $417,661 49 payments
  8. Phase 3 substudy enrolling approximately 100 subjects aged 18 to 70 years old with PKU who are concurrently participating in the 165-302 study $415,928 28 payments
  9. A Phase 1b/2 Dose-Escalation and Cohort-Expansion Study to Determine the Safety and Efficacy of BGB-11417 in Combination With Dexamethasone and Carfilzomib/Dexamethasone in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma and t(11;14) $333,843 67 payments
  10. A Phase 1 Trial to Evaluate the Potential Impact of Renal Impairment on the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of CPX -351 (Daunorubicin and Cytarabine) Liposome for Injection Treatment in Adult Patients With Hematologic Malignancies $254,059 2 payments
What the money was spent on Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Other $21,464 3 payments

Only reported on some payments, and a payment can report more than one category, so these amounts overlap.

What you are looking at

A noncovered recipient is an organisation paid for research that is neither an individual clinician nor a teaching hospital — typically a contract research organisation, a foundation or a trial site network. They receive 81% of all reported research money, which is why they appear here at all.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record