Organisation paid for research Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Texas Oncology, PA

Neither a doctor nor a teaching hospital

Research payments

$4,888,643

1,171 payments

Through program year 2025, Texas Oncology, PA is reported as receiving $4,888,643 in research payments, across 1,171 payments.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $2,332,380 58
2024 Research $174,770 71
2023 Research $712,224 165
2022 Research $220,342 208
2021 Research $309,866 294
2020 Research $670,354 88
2019 Research $468,707 287

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $2,842,393 106 payments
  2. Eisai Inc. $677,322 685 payments
  3. Celgene Corporation $412,879 11 payments
  4. AstraZeneca UK Limited $282,593 19 payments
  5. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $272,894 47 payments
  6. Novocure Inc. $173,723 86 payments
  7. EMD Serono, Inc. $122,989 141 payments
  8. Novocure GmbH $51,762 39 payments
  9. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $28,330 2 payments
  10. Acerta Pharma LLC $20,896 8 payments
Studies the money was for Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. A Phase III, Open-label, Randomised Study of Neoadjuvant Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato DXd) Plus Durvalumab Followed by Adjuvant Durvalumab With or Without Chemotherapy Versus Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy Followed by Adjuvant Pembrolizumab With or Without Chemotherapy for the Treatment of Adult Patients with Untreated Triple-Negative or Hormone Receptor low/HER2-negative Breast Cancer (TROPION Breast04) $1,142,096 6 payments
  2. A Randomized 2-cohort Double-blind Placebo-controlled Phase III Study of AZD5305 in Combination with Physicians Choice New Hormonal Agents in Patients with HRRm and non-HRRm Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer EvoPAR-Prostate01 $325,623 6 payments
  3. A Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized, Phase 3 Trial to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Lenvatinib in Combination With Everolimus or Pembrolizumab Versus Sunitinib Alone in First-Line Treatment of Subjects With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma (CLEAR) $305,819 430 payments
  4. A Safety Trial of Lisocabtagene Maraleucel (JCAR017) for Relapsed and Refractory (R/R) B-cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL) in the Outpatient Setting $275,051 1 payment
  5. A Single-arm, Multicenter, Phase 2 Trial to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Lenvatinib in Combination With Everolimus in Subjects With Unresectable Advanced or Metastatic Non Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (nccRCC) Who Have Not Received Any Chemotherapy for Advanced Disease $270,134 130 payments
  6. Phase III Study of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (T-DXd) with or without Pertuzumab versus Taxane Trastuzumab and Pertuzumab in HER2-positive First-line Metastatic Breast Cancer (DESTINY-Breast09) $255,557 16 payments
  7. A Phase III, Open-label, Randomised Study of Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) With or Without Durvalumab Compared with Investigators Choice of Chemotherapy (Paclitaxel, Nab-paclitaxel or Gemcitabine + Carboplatin) in Combination With Pembrolizumab in Patients with PD-L1 Positive Locally Recurrent Inoperable or Metastatic Triple-negative Breast Cancer (TROPION-Breast05) $252,734 4 payments
  8. an observational,prospective,multicenter study of non small cell lung cancer patients in the US receiving standard of care and initiating an approved therapy with risk of pneumonitis ILD $204,363 10 payments
  9. Capivasertib plus Palbociclib plus Fulvestrant for HR/HER2 Advanced Breast Cancer CAPItello 292. $145,759 2 payments
  10. EF-24 Pivotal, randomized, open-label study of Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) concurrent with standard of care therapies for treatment of stage 4 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) following platinum failure. $126,079 59 payments
What the money was spent on Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Patient care $22,819 2 payments

Only reported on some payments, and a payment can report more than one category, so these amounts overlap.

What you are looking at

A noncovered recipient is an organisation paid for research that is neither an individual clinician nor a teaching hospital — typically a contract research organisation, a foundation or a trial site network. They receive 81% of all reported research money, which is why they appear here at all.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record