Organisation paid for research Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Texas Oncology P.A.

Neither a doctor nor a teaching hospital

Research payments

$1,136,335

362 payments

Through program year 2025, Texas Oncology P.A. is reported as receiving $1,136,335 in research payments, across 362 payments.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $739,266 2
2024 Research $248,676 261
2021 Research $47,443 46
2020 Research $39,766 44
2019 Research $61,184 9

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Aadi Bioscience, Inc. $987,659 259 payments
  2. EMD Serono, Inc. $78,188 88 payments
  3. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $41,278 6 payments
  4. Acerta Pharma LLC $19,731 2 payments
  5. Gilead Sciences, Inc. $9,196 3 payments
  6. Amgen Inc. $283 4 payments
Studies the money was for Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Trial of Nab-sirolimus in Patients With Well-differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumors (NETs) of the Gastrointestinal Tract Lung or Pancreas Who Have Not Received Prior Treatment With mTOR Inhibitors $634,307 189 payments
  2. Trial of Nab-Sirolimus in Combination With Letrozole in Patients With Advanced or Recurrent Endometrioid Endometrial Cancer $353,351 70 payments
  3. A Study of Bendamustine and Rituximab Alone Versus in Combination With Acalabrutinib in Subjects With Previously Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma $26,415 4 payments
  4. A Phase II, Multicenter, Open Label Study of Bintrafusp alfa (M7824) Monotherapy in Participants with HMGA2-expressing Triple Negative Breast Cancer $24,026 24 payments
  5. A Phase II single-arm trial to investigate tepotinib in advanced (Stage IIIb and IV) non-small cell lung cancer with MET exon 14 (METex14) skipping alterations or MET amplification (VISION) $23,426 25 payments
  6. A Phase 2 Open-label, Multicenter, Randomized, Multidrug Platform Study of Neoadjuvant Durvalumab Alone or in Combination with Novel Agents in Subjects with Resectable, Early-stage (I [ less than 2 cm] to IIIA) Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NeoCOAST) $16,866 2 payments
  7. To assess safety and tolerability describe the dose limiting toxicities determine the maximum tolerated dose MTD or the highest protocol defined dose maximum administered dose in the absence of establishing the MTD and a recommended dose for further evaluation of MEDI7247 in patients with selected hematological malignancies who have relapsed after or are refractory to prior standard therapy and for whom there is no standard salvage regimen available $13,583 1 payment
  8. An Adaptive Phase III, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label, Controlled Study of M7824 (bintrafusp alfa) versus Pembrolizumab as a First-line Treatment in Patients with PD-L1 Expressing Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer $11,943 11 payments
  9. An Open-Label, First-in-Human Study of the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of VX-970/M6620 in Combination With Cytotoxic Chemotherapy in Subjects With Advanced Solid Tumors $10,516 11 payments
  10. A Phase I, open-label, multiple-ascending dose trial to investigate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, biological and clinical activity of MSB0011359C in subjects with metastatic or locally advanced solid tumors with expansion to selected indications. $8,277 17 payments

What you are looking at

A noncovered recipient is an organisation paid for research that is neither an individual clinician nor a teaching hospital — typically a contract research organisation, a foundation or a trial site network. They receive 81% of all reported research money, which is why they appear here at all.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record