Organisation paid for research Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Tekton Research Inc

Neither a doctor nor a teaching hospital

Research payments

$54,228,445

20,694 payments

Through program year 2025, Tekton Research Inc is reported as receiving $54,228,445 in research payments, across 20,694 payments.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $1,449,519 335
2024 Research $3,060,641 386
2023 Research $13,018,144 9,626
2022 Research $17,055,579 7,853
2021 Research $13,414,081 630
2020 Research $3,651,375 631
2019 Research $2,579,106 1,233

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Moderna TX, Inc. $23,188,461 15,957 payments
  2. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $9,393,380 35 payments
  3. Pfizer Inc. $7,151,118 1,029 payments
  4. Bavarian Nordic A/S $3,726,132 411 payments
  5. Eli Lilly and Company $1,810,165 89 payments
  6. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $1,535,719 456 payments
  7. Janssen Research & Development, LLC $1,510,785 213 payments
  8. Emergent BioSolutions Inc. $1,155,793 1,327 payments
  9. Novavax Inc $1,052,122 204 payments
  10. Seqirus USA Inc $838,036 199 payments
Studies the money was for Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. A Phase III Randomized Double-blind Placebo-controlled Multicenter Study in Adults to Determine the Safety Efficacy and Immunogenicity of AZD1222 a Non-replicating ChAdOx1 Vector Vaccine for the Prevention of COVID-19 $9,243,104 16 payments
  2. A Phase 3, Randomized, Stratified, Observer-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Immunogenicity of mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine in Adults Aged 18 Years and Older $5,506,341 381 payments
  3. A Randomized, Observer-Blind, Active-Controlled Phase 3 Study to Investigate the Safety, Immunogenicity, and Relative Vaccine Efficacy of mRNA-1283.222 Administered as a Booster Dose Compared With mRNA-1273.222 in Participants Aged 12 Years and Older for the Prevention of COVID-19 $4,103,525 6,120 payments
  4. A Phase 3, Randomized, Observer-blind, Active-controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of mRNA-1010 Candidate Seasonal Influenza Vaccine in Adults 50 Years and Older $3,018,773 6,378 payments
  5. ABNCoV2 Vaccine in Adult Subjects Previously Vaccinated for SARS-CoV-2 $2,914,635 164 payments
  6. A Phase 2/3, Randomized, Observer-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety, Reactogenicity, and Effectiveness of mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine in Healthy Adolescents 12 to <18 years of age $2,861,558 92 payments
  7. A Phase 2/3, Two-Part, Open-Label, Dose Escalation, Age De-escalation and Randomized, Observer Blind, Placebo-Controlled Expansion Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Reactogenicity, and Effectiveness of mRNA 1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine in Health $2,401,762 116 payments
  8. A Phase 3 Randomized Observerblinded Study to Evaluate the Efficacy Safety Tolerability and Immunogenicity of A Modified Rna Vaccine Against Influenza Compared to Licensed Inactivated Influenza Vaccine in Healthy Adults 18 Years of Age Or Older $2,182,856 235 payments
  9. A Phase 2/3, Randomized, Observer-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of mRNA-1345, an mRNA Vaccine Targeting Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV), in Adults 60 Years of Age $1,882,407 81 payments
  10. A Phase 3, Randomized, Observer-blind, Active-controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of mRNA-1010 Candidate Seasonal Influenza Vaccine in Adults 50 Years and Older $1,460,617 2,417 payments
What the money was spent on Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Other $119,763 26 payments

Only reported on some payments, and a payment can report more than one category, so these amounts overlap.

What you are looking at

A noncovered recipient is an organisation paid for research that is neither an individual clinician nor a teaching hospital — typically a contract research organisation, a foundation or a trial site network. They receive 81% of all reported research money, which is why they appear here at all.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record