Organisation paid for research Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Spokane Urology

Neither a doctor nor a teaching hospital

Research payments

$1,471,790

219 payments

Through program year 2025, Spokane Urology is reported as receiving $1,471,790 in research payments, across 219 payments.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $450,044 59
2024 Research $719,893 66
2023 Research $141,313 34
2022 Research $102,865 48
2021 Research $57,675 12

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Janssen Research & Development, LLC $1,234,069 191 payments
  2. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $84,708 1 payment
  3. Urogen Pharma, Inc. $77,122 26 payments
  4. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $75,891 1 payment
Studies the money was for Research payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. A Phase 3, Open-Label, Multi-Center, Randomized Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of TAR-200 in Combination with Cetrelimab Versus Intravesical Bacillus CalmetteGurin (BCG) in Participants with BCG-nave High-Risk Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Canc $731,870 73 payments
  2. A Multi Center Open label Single arm Phase 2 Study of the Adjuvant Treatment of Apalutamide and Androgen Deprivation Therapy ADT in Treatment naive Participants Who Have Undergone Radical Prostatectomy RP for Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer and Who Are at High Risk for Metastases $119,777 57 payments
  3. a phase 3b,open label,single arm,multi center,US study of bacillus calmette guerin bcg administered in combination with durvalumab in adult bcg naive,high risk non muscle invasive bladder cancer participants patapsco $84,708 1 payment
  4. A Phase 3, Randomized, Open-label Study of MK-5684 Versus Alternative Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide in Participants with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer mCRPC That Progressed On or After Prior Treatment with One Next generation Hor $75,891 1 payment
  5. Bl011 - A Phase 3 Single-Arm Study of Ugn -102 for Treatment of Low Grade Intermediate Risk Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer (Envision) $73,301 20 payments
  6. A Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter, Open-label Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Adding Apalutamide to Radiotherapy and LHRH Agonist in High-Risk Patients with PSMA-PET-Positive Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer, with an Observational Fo $68,254 19 payments
  7. A Phase 3, Randomized, Open-label, Multi-center Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of TAR-200 Versus Investigator's Choice of Intravesical Chemotherapy in Participants Who Received Bacillus Calmette-Gurin (BCG) and Recurred with High-risk Non-musc $66,447 11 payments
  8. A Multi Center Open label Single arm Phase 2 Study of the Adjuvant Treatment of Apalutamide and Androgen Deprivation Therapy ADT in Treatment naive Participants Who Have Undergone Radical Prostatectomy RP for Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer and Who Are at Hi $57,675 12 payments
  9. A Phase 3, Open-Label, Multi-Center, Randomized Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of TAR-200 in Combination with Cetrelimab Versus Intravesical Bacillus CalmetteGurin (BCG) in Participants with BCG-nave High-Risk Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (HR-NMIBC) $49,819 6 payments
  10. A Phase 3, Open-Label, Multi-Center, Randomized Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of TAR-200 in Combination with Cetrelimab Versus Intravesical Bacillus CalmetteGu?rin (BCG) in Participants with BCG-na?ve High-Risk Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Canc $39,000 1 payment

What you are looking at

A noncovered recipient is an organisation paid for research that is neither an individual clinician nor a teaching hospital — typically a contract research organisation, a foundation or a trial site network. They receive 81% of all reported research money, which is why they appear here at all.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record