Organisation paid for research Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Somnos Clinical Research

Neither a doctor nor a teaching hospital

Research payments

$1,886,885

280 payments

Through program year 2025, Somnos Clinical Research is reported as receiving $1,886,885 in research payments, across 280 payments.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $432,320 52
2024 Research $220,572 65
2023 Research $275,049 42
2022 Research $465,317 33
2021 Research $188,149 17
2020 Research $91,460 29
2019 Research $214,019 42

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $724,707 38 payments
  2. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $183,136 9 payments
  3. AstraZeneca UK Limited $176,371 19 payments
  4. Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated $165,281 1 payment
  5. CSL Behring $161,849 52 payments
  6. Amgen Inc. $144,691 12 payments
  7. Adamas Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $100,361 43 payments
  8. Amylyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $37,886 9 payments
  9. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $35,565 23 payments
  10. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $33,495 2 payments
Studies the money was for Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. A Multicenter, Randomized, Double blind, Parallel group, Placebo controlled Study to Investigate the Use of Benralizumab for Eosinophilic Esophagitis (MESSINA) $221,527 7 payments
  2. A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study of Povetacicept in Adults With Immunoglobulin A Nephropathy (RAINIER) $165,281 1 payment
  3. A Phase 2b/3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Combined Dose-Finding and Cardiovascular Outcome Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of CSL300 (Clazakizumab) in Subjects With End Stage Kidney Disease Undergoing Dialysis $157,599 50 payments
  4. A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase 3 Study of Remibrutinib (Lou064) to Investigate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability for 52 Weeks in Adult Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria (Csu) Patients Inadequately Controlled By H1-Antihi $141,821 2 payments
  5. A Randomized Double Blind Double Dummy Parallel Group Multicenter 24 to 52 Week Variable Length Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Budesonide Glycopyrronium and Formoterol Fumarate Metered Dose Inhaler $136,384 10 payments
  6. A Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Placebo-Controlled Phase III Efficacy and Safety Study of Tezepelumab in Patients with Eosinophilic Esophagitis (CROSSING) $120,001 2 payments
  7. The CHRONICLE Study is a multi center non interventional prospective cohort study of adults with severe asthma who do not achieve control with high dose inhaled corticosteroid ICS therapy with additional controllers and or require systemic corticosteroid or monoclonal antibody therapy $89,854 4 payments
  8. A 3-Arm Multicenter Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Randomized Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Ads-5102 Amantadine Extended Release Capsules in Multiple Sclerosis Patients With Walking Impairment $78,848 33 payments
  9. a randomized,double blind,multicenter,parallel group,phase IIIb 52 week study evaluating the efficacy and safety of PT027 compared with PT007 administered as needed in participants 12 to under 18 years of age with asthma ACADIA $63,297 3 payments
  10. A Randomized Double-Blind Parallel Group Multi-Center 24-Week Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Three Doses of PT001 to Placebo and Open-label Spiriva Respimat in Subjects With Persistent Asthma $61,905 4 payments
What the money was spent on Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Other $5,500 2 payments

Only reported on some payments, and a payment can report more than one category, so these amounts overlap.

What you are looking at

A noncovered recipient is an organisation paid for research that is neither an individual clinician nor a teaching hospital — typically a contract research organisation, a foundation or a trial site network. They receive 81% of all reported research money, which is why they appear here at all.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record