Organisation paid for research Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Sandhill Research LLC

Neither a doctor nor a teaching hospital

Research payments

$24,364,850

5,920 payments

Through program year 2025, Sandhill Research LLC is reported as receiving $24,364,850 in research payments, across 5,920 payments.

By program year

6 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $5,700,616 634
2024 Research $6,742,968 838
2023 Research $6,836,061 3,000
2022 Research $3,913,949 1,185
2021 Research $1,013,213 237
2020 Research $158,044 26

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2020–2025
  1. Moderna TX, Inc. $9,851,155 3,786 payments
  2. Bavarian Nordic A/S $2,130,329 124 payments
  3. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,793,767 27 payments
  4. Eli Lilly and Company $1,730,081 26 payments
  5. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $1,266,025 172 payments
  6. AbbVie, Inc. $1,141,669 339 payments
  7. Novavax Inc $795,542 99 payments
  8. Pfizer Inc. $742,684 180 payments
  9. Eisai Inc. $661,261 19 payments
  10. Genentech, Inc. $499,149 82 payments
Studies the money was for Research payments · program years 2020–2025
  1. A Randomized, Observer-Blind, Active-Controlled Phase 3 Study to Investigate the Safety, Immunogenicity, and Relative Vaccine Efficacy of mRNA-1283.222 Administered as a Booster Dose Compared With mRNA-1273.222 in Participants Aged 12 Years and Older for the Prevention of COVID-19 $2,316,193 1,143 payments
  2. A Phase 1, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Observer-Blind, Dose-Ranging Study to Evaluate the Safety, Reactogenicity, and Immunogenicity of mRNA-1403 and mRNA-1405, Multivalent Candidate Vaccines to Prevent Norovirus Acute Gastroenteritis in Healthy Adults 18 to 49 Years of Age and 60 to 80 Years of Age $1,463,921 26 payments
  3. ABNCoV2 Vaccine in Adult Subjects Previously Vaccinated for SARS-CoV-2 $1,385,740 55 payments
  4. A Phase 2/3, Randomized, Observer-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of mRNA-1345, an mRNA Vaccine Targeting Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV), in Adults 60 Years of Age $960,121 42 payments
  5. A Study to Investigate the Safety and Efficacy of mRNA-1403 in Participants ?18 Years of Age for the Prevention of Acute Gastroenteritis $826,686 124 payments
  6. A Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, 18-Month Study With an Open-Label Extension Phase to Confirm Safety and Efficacy of BAN2401 in Subjects With Early Alzheimer's Disease $661,261 19 payments
  7. A Phase 3, Randomized, Observer-blind, Active-controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of mRNA-1010 Candidate Seasonal Influenza Vaccine in Adults 50 Years and Older $625,413 853 payments
  8. A Phase III Randomised Double Blind PlaceboControlled Parallel Group Study to Assess the Effect of AZD0780 on Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol in Patients With Elevated Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Clinical Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease or at Risk for a First Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Event $599,476 2 payments
  9. A Phase 3, Randomized, Observer-blind, Active-controlled, Case-drivenStudy to Investigate the Safety, Efficacy, and Immunogenicity of mRNA-1010 Candidate Seasonal Influenza Vaccine Compared with a Licensed Inactivated Seasonal Influenza Vaccine in Adults 50 Years of Age $595,754 9 payments
  10. A Phase 3 Randomized Observerblinded Study to Evaluate the Efficacy Safety Tolerability and Immunogenicity of A Modified Rna Vaccine Against Influenza Compared to Licensed Inactivated Influenza Vaccine in Healthy Adults 18 Years of Age Or Older $584,089 106 payments
What the money was spent on Research payments · program years 2020–2025
  1. Patient care $74,842 29 payments

Only reported on some payments, and a payment can report more than one category, so these amounts overlap.

What you are looking at

A noncovered recipient is an organisation paid for research that is neither an individual clinician nor a teaching hospital — typically a contract research organisation, a foundation or a trial site network. They receive 81% of all reported research money, which is why they appear here at all.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record