Organisation paid for research Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Riley Hospital for Children at Indiana University Health

Neither a doctor nor a teaching hospital

Research payments

$1,387,214

679 payments

Through program year 2025, Riley Hospital for Children at Indiana University Health is reported as receiving $1,387,214 in research payments, across 679 payments.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $85,681 47
2024 Research $257,463 15
2023 Research $327,736 352
2022 Research $341,842 209
2021 Research $249,850 21
2020 Research $673 19
2019 Research $123,968 16

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated $1,115,685 46 payments
  2. Novo Nordisk AS $122,518 550 payments
  3. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $73,412 2 payments
  4. Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC $49,359 38 payments
  5. AbbVie, Inc. $19,904 5 payments
  6. Pacira Pharmaceuticals Incorporated $5,430 4 payments
  7. Boehringer Ingelheim Italia S.p.A. $583 22 payments
  8. Boehringer Ingelheim France S.A.S. $323 12 payments
Studies the money was for Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. A Phase 3, Open-label Study Evaluating the Long-term Safety and Efficacy of VX-121 Combination Therapy in Subjects With Cystic Fibrosis $159,785 3 payments
  2. A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of VX-121 Combination Therapy in Subjects With Cystic Fibrosis Who Are Homozygous for F508del, Heterozygous for F508del and a Gating (F/G) or Residual Function (F/RF) Mutation, or Have At Least 1 Other Triple Combination Responsive CFTR Mutation and No F508del Mutation $139,531 4 payments
  3. A Phase 3 Study Evaluating the Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of VX-121/Tezacaftor/Deutivacaftor Triple Combination Therapy in Cystic Fibrosis Subjects 1 Through 11 Years of Age $126,086 3 payments
  4. Nn8640-4467 $122,518 550 payments
  5. Evaluation of ELX/TEZ/IVA in Cystic Fibrosis (CF) Subjects 2 Through 5 Years $110,008 2 payments
  6. A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of VX-121 Combination Therapy in Subjects With Cystic Fibrosis Who Are Heterozygous for F508del and a Minimal Function Mutation (F/MF) $107,134 4 payments
  7. A Phase 3 Open-label Study Evaluating the Long-term Safety and Efficacy of Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor Triple Combination Therapy in Cystic Fibrosis Subjects 2 Years and Older $96,604 3 payments
  8. Long-term Safety of Lumacaftor/Ivacaftor in Subjects With Cystic Fibrosis Who Are Homozygous for F508del and 12 to <24 Months of Age at Treatment Initiation $73,496 5 payments
  9. Safety and Pharmacokinetic Study of Lumacaftor/Ivacaftor in Subjects 1 to Less Than 2 Years of Age With Cystic Fibrosis, Homozygous for F508del $59,418 4 payments
  10. A Phase 3, Open-label Study Evaluating the Long-term Safety and Efficacy of Vanzacaftor/Tezacaftor/Deutivacaftor Triple Combination Therapy in Cystic Fibrosis Subjects 1 Year of Age and Older $59,375 2 payments
What the money was spent on Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Overhead $49,359 38 payments

Only reported on some payments, and a payment can report more than one category, so these amounts overlap.

What you are looking at

A noncovered recipient is an organisation paid for research that is neither an individual clinician nor a teaching hospital — typically a contract research organisation, a foundation or a trial site network. They receive 81% of all reported research money, which is why they appear here at all.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record