Organisation paid for research Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

R and R Eye Research LLC

Neither a doctor nor a teaching hospital

Research payments

$1,024,349

71 payments

Through program year 2025, R and R Eye Research LLC is reported as receiving $1,024,349 in research payments, across 71 payments.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $352,815 12
2024 Research $237,936 8
2023 Research $39,117 13
2022 Research $326,801 18
2021 Research $14,734 4
2020 Research $39,663 11
2019 Research $13,283 5

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Oyster Point Pharma, Inc. $630,277 17 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $291,526 24 payments
  3. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $38,794 10 payments
  4. Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. $27,600 9 payments
  5. RxSight Inc $22,000 5 payments
  6. Shire North American Group Inc $10,103 4 payments
  7. Ivantis, Inc $3,180 1 payment
  8. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $869 1 payment
Studies the money was for Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. A Randomized, Double-Masked, Vehicle-Controlled, Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Pimecrolimus 0.3% Ophthalmic Ointment (MR-139), in Subjects With Blepharitis $566,909 13 payments
  2. Currently available treatments for presbyopia (old eye) include nonsurgical options (spectacles or contact lenses) and surgical options, however, each has its own risks and limitations. The purpose of this study is to evaluate how effective AGN-190584 is in treating presbyopia compared to vehicle (placebo). $120,016 2 payments
  3. A Study to Assess Safety and Efficacy in Participants Age 40 to 55 With Presbyopia (Old Eye) Who Receive AGN-190584 in Both Eyes Twice Daily (Virgo) $68,150 4 payments
  4. Phase 1x2F2 Study of AGN-241622 in Healthy Participants and Participants With Presbyopia $59,624 2 payments
  5. A Phase 2, Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled, Double-Masked Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Oc-01 (Varenicline) Nasal Spray in Subjects With Neurotrophic Keratopathy (The Olympia Study) $50,244 2 payments
  6. Clinical Evaluation of the Vision Performance of Tecnis Eyhance Intraocular Lenses with Tecnic Simplicity as Compared to Tecnis 1-Piece Intraocular Lenses $27,600 9 payments
  7. Study to Assess Change in Disease Activity and Adverse Events of Ab Externo Approach for Glaucoma Gel Stent (XEN45) Implantation In Participants Aged 45 Years or Older With Open-Angle Glaucoma $26,284 9 payments
  8. A Phase 3, Randomized, Multicenter, Double-masked Study to Compare the Ocular Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of ISV-305 (0.1% Dexamethasone in DuraSite 2) to DuraSite 2 Vehicle for the Treatment of Inflammation and Pain Associated With Cataract Surgery $23,043 5 payments
  9. Pmcs-010 $22,000 5 payments
  10. A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Masked, Parallel-Group, Comparative Study to Evaluate the Clinical Efficacy and Safety of ISV-305 (0.1% Dexamethasone) Compared to Vehicle in the Treatment of Subjects With Blepharitis $15,751 5 payments
What the money was spent on Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Other $38,794 10 payments

Only reported on some payments, and a payment can report more than one category, so these amounts overlap.

What you are looking at

A noncovered recipient is an organisation paid for research that is neither an individual clinician nor a teaching hospital — typically a contract research organisation, a foundation or a trial site network. They receive 81% of all reported research money, which is why they appear here at all.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record