Organisation paid for research Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Prolato Research LLC

Neither a doctor nor a teaching hospital

Research payments

$3,790,768

762 payments

Through program year 2025, Prolato Research LLC is reported as receiving $3,790,768 in research payments, across 762 payments.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $1,192,267 120
2024 Research $781,050 108
2023 Research $1,036,422 164
2022 Research $614,350 70
2021 Research $76,597 185
2020 Research $79,552 112
2019 Research $10,530 3

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Sanofi US Services Inc. $827,639 80 payments
  2. Pfizer Inc. $716,427 77 payments
  3. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $504,634 22 payments
  4. AstraZeneca UK Limited $388,718 4 payments
  5. Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc. $335,554 9 payments
  6. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $230,438 10 payments
  7. Retrophin, Inc. $200,722 399 payments
  8. Hoffmann-La Roche Limited $146,728 77 payments
  9. Amgen Inc. $115,677 4 payments
  10. Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $65,018 5 payments
Studies the money was for Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. A Phase I-III Randomized Double blind Study to Evaluate the Safety and Neutralizing Activity of AZD5156-AZD3152 for Pre exposure Prophylaxis of COVID 19 in Participants with Conditions Causing Immune Impairment $334,386 3 payments
  2. A Phase 1 Randomized Study to Evaluate the Safety Tolerability and Immunogenicity of Combined Modified Rna Vaccine Candidates Against Covid19 and Influenza in Healthy Individuals $291,430 23 payments
  3. A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallelgroup, 3-arm, Multinational, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Amlitelimab Monotherapy by Subcutaneous Injection in Participants Aged 18 Years and Older With Moderate-to-severe Atopic Dermatitis $221,310 12 payments
  4. A Phase 3 Randomized Observerblinded Study to Evaluate the Efficacy Safety Tolerability and Immunogenicity of A Modified Rna Vaccine Against Influenza Compared to Licensed Inactivated Influenza Vaccine in Healthy Adults 18 Years of Age Or Older $215,338 21 payments
  5. A Phase 12 Randomized Study to Evaluate the Safety Tolerability and Immunogenicity of A Modified Rna Vaccine Against Influenza in Healthy Individuals $187,589 22 payments
  6. Efficacy and Safety of SAR441344 in the Treatment of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo-controlled, Phase 2, Proof of Concept Study $163,100 18 payments
  7. A Phase 2 Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Dose-ranging, Efficacy and Safety Study of SAR441566 Plus Methotrexate in Adults With ModeratetoSevere Rheumatoid Arthritis $162,436 12 payments
  8. A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Sibeprenlimab Administered Subcutaneously in Subjects With Immunoglobulin A Nephropathy $147,591 3 payments
  9. Multicenter Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Anifrolumab in Adult Patients with Active Proliferative Lupus Nephritis $125,050 2 payments
  10. A Phase 3, Multinational, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group 48-week Extension Study to Evaluate the Treatment Response and Safety of Two Amlitelimab Dose Regimens Administered as Monotherapy by Subcutaneous Injection in Participants Aged 12 Years and Older With Moderate-to-severe Atopic Dermatitis $117,620 7 payments
What the money was spent on Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Other $180,026 369 payments

Only reported on some payments, and a payment can report more than one category, so these amounts overlap.

What you are looking at

A noncovered recipient is an organisation paid for research that is neither an individual clinician nor a teaching hospital — typically a contract research organisation, a foundation or a trial site network. They receive 81% of all reported research money, which is why they appear here at all.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record