Organisation paid for research Program year 2023 Source: CMS Open Payments

Pinnacle Research Institute

Neither a doctor nor a teaching hospital

Research payments

$2,385,516

151 payments

Through program year 2023, Pinnacle Research Institute is reported as receiving $2,385,516 in research payments, across 151 payments.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2023 Research $91,476 16
2022 Research $726,508 97
2021 Research $1,185,511 23
2020 Research $223,947 9
2019 Research $158,074 6

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2023
  1. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $1,378,811 112 payments
  2. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $748,571 11 payments
  3. Allergan Inc. $181,071 9 payments
  4. Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $71,063 17 payments
  5. Roche TCRC, Inc. $6,000 2 payments
Studies the money was for Research payments · program years 2019–2023
  1. A Randomized, Double-Masked, Active-Controlled Phase 2/3 Study of the Efficacy and Safety of High-Dose Aflibercept in Patients With Diabetic Macular Edema $1,374,061 111 payments
  2. A 64-Week, Phase 3B, Multi-Center Study Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Brolucizumab 6Mg Compared to Aflibercept 2Mg in A Treat to Control Regimen in Patients With Neovascular Age-Related MacUlar Degeneration $222,190 2 payments
  3. Multicenter Double Masked Randomized Vehicle-Controlled Parallel-Group study of AGN-190584 for Participants with Presbyopia $181,071 9 payments
  4. A 96-Week, Two-Arm, Randomized, Single-Masked, Multi-Center, Phase III Study Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Brolucizumab 6 MG Compared to Panretinal Photocoagulation Laser in Patients With Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy $160,632 3 payments
  5. A Randomized, Double-Masked, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Ecf843 VS Vehicle in Subjects With Dry Eye Disease $128,891 1 payment
  6. A 12-Month, 2-Arm, Randomized, Double-Masked, Multicenter Phase III Study Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Brolucizumab VS. Aflibercept in Patients With Visual Impairment Due to Diabetic MacUlar Edema (Kingfisher) $113,311 2 payments
  7. A 12-Week Parallel Group, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blinded, Multi-Center Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of 2 Concentrations of Saf312 Eye Drops (5 MG/ML and 15 MG/ML) Used Twice-Daily in the Treatment of Post-Operative Corneal Induced $80,774 1 payment
  8. Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Intravitreal APL-2 Therapy With Sham Injections in Patients With Geographic Atrophy (GA) Secondary to Age-Related Macular Degeneration $38,507 5 payments
  9. A 12-Week Parallel Group, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blinded, Multi-Center Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of 2 Concentrations of Saf312 Eye Drops (5 MG/ML and 15 MG/ML) Used Twice-Daily in the Treatment of Post-Operative Corneal Induced Chronic Pain (Cicp) Following Photorefractive Keratectomy (PRK) Or Laser-Assisted in Situ Keratomileusis (Lasik) Surgeries $25,203 1 payment
  10. A 56-Week Phase Iiib/Iv, Open-Label, One-Arm Extension Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Brolucizumab 6 MG in A Treat-To-Control Regimen With Maximum Treatment Intervals Up to 20 Weeks for the Treatment of Patients With Neovascular Age-Related Ma $17,569 1 payment

What you are looking at

A noncovered recipient is an organisation paid for research that is neither an individual clinician nor a teaching hospital — typically a contract research organisation, a foundation or a trial site network. They receive 81% of all reported research money, which is why they appear here at all.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2023

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record