Organisation paid for research Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Pharmaseek LLC

Neither a doctor nor a teaching hospital

Research payments

$54,529,068

7,660 payments

Through program year 2025, Pharmaseek LLC is reported as receiving $54,529,068 in research payments, across 7,660 payments.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $8,063,507 1,820
2024 Research $4,384,017 833
2023 Research $6,203,772 993
2022 Research $13,959,280 1,409
2021 Research $16,443,987 763
2020 Research $1,998,814 639
2019 Research $3,475,691 1,203

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Moderna TX, Inc. $9,291,650 379 payments
  2. AstraZeneca UK Limited $7,905,239 19 payments
  3. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $6,244,538 28 payments
  4. Indivior Inc. $5,374,404 328 payments
  5. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $4,361,919 781 payments
  6. Seqirus USA Inc $4,104,178 1,302 payments
  7. Pfizer Inc. $1,852,816 312 payments
  8. Sanofi Pasteur Inc. $1,467,158 129 payments
  9. AbbVie, Inc. $1,211,498 478 payments
  10. Bavarian Nordic A/S $1,207,060 112 payments
Studies the money was for Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. A Phase III Randomized Double-blind Placebo-controlled Multi-center Study in Adults to Determine the Safety and Efficacy of AZD7442 a Combination Product of Two Monoclonal Antibodies (AZD8895 and AZD1061) for Pre-exposure Prophylaxis of COVID-19 $11,923,164 22 payments
  2. A Phase 2/3, Randomized, Observer-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of mRNA-1345, an mRNA Vaccine Targeting Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV), in Adults 60 Years of Age $5,852,744 85 payments
  3. A Randomised, Double-Blind Study Comparing 2 Maintenance Dosing Regimens of Buprenorphine Extended-Release Subcutaneous Injection (Rbp-6000) in Treatment-Seeking Adult Participants With Opioid Use Disorder and High-Risk Opioid Use $5,088,734 304 payments
  4. A Phase 3/3b Randomized Observer-blind Multicenter Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy Safety and Immunogenicity of an MF59-Adjuvanted Quadrivalent Subunit Inactivated Influenza Vaccine Compared to a Non-Influenza Vaccine in Adults >=50 Years of Age $4,104,178 1,302 payments
  5. A Phase III Randomized Double-blind Placebo-controlled Multi-center Study in Adults to Determine the Safety and Efficacy of AZD7442 a Combination Product of Two Monoclonal Antibodies AZD8895 and AZD1061 for Post-exposure Prophylaxis of COVID-19 $2,077,945 5 payments
  6. PH III Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Astegolimab in COPD $1,101,198 208 payments
  7. A Phase 2, Randomized, Observer-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Dose Confirmation Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Immunogenicity of Lyophilized Zika Vaccine mRNA-1893 in Adults Aged 18-65 Years and Living in Endemic and Non Endemic Flavivi $1,075,841 62 payments
  8. A Phase 1/2, First-Time-In Human (Ftih), Randomized, Observer-Blind, P $1,003,838 35 payments
  9. A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of mRNA-1345 Vaccine Targeting Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) in Adults ?60 Years of Age $984,197 65 payments
  10. A Phase 3 Randomized Placebocontrolled Observerblinded Trial to Evaluate the Safety of A 6Valent Ospabased Lyme Disease Vaccine Vla15 in Healthy Children 5 Through 17 Years of Age $837,355 52 payments
What the money was spent on Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Patient care $154,539 17 payments
  2. Other $133,559 4 payments

Only reported on some payments, and a payment can report more than one category, so these amounts overlap.

What you are looking at

A noncovered recipient is an organisation paid for research that is neither an individual clinician nor a teaching hospital — typically a contract research organisation, a foundation or a trial site network. They receive 81% of all reported research money, which is why they appear here at all.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record