Organisation paid for research Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Pediatric Skin Research LLC

Neither a doctor nor a teaching hospital

Research payments

$1,949,494

578 payments

Through program year 2025, Pediatric Skin Research LLC is reported as receiving $1,949,494 in research payments, across 578 payments.

By program year

6 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $845,894 121
2024 Research $216,987 197
2023 Research $347,629 165
2022 Research $137,349 36
2021 Research $293,381 44
2020 Research $108,253 15

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2020–2025
  1. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $510,195 151 payments
  2. Sanofi US Services Inc. $398,742 42 payments
  3. Eli Lilly and Company $284,703 12 payments
  4. Incyte Corporation $188,866 69 payments
  5. Pfizer Inc. $179,153 16 payments
  6. AbbVie, Inc. $174,518 36 payments
  7. Dermavant Sciences, Inc. $136,139 251 payments
  8. Amgen Inc. $77,178 1 payment
Studies the money was for Research payments · program years 2020–2025
  1. An Open-Label Extension Study to Assess the Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Dupilumab in Patients >=6 Months to <18 Years of Age With Atopic Dermatitis $319,645 119 payments
  2. A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallelgroup, 3-arm, Multinational, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Amlitelimab Monotherapy by Subcutaneous Injection in Participants Aged 18 Years and Older With Moderate-to-severe Atopic Dermatitis $192,141 11 payments
  3. A Phase 3, Multinational, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group 48-week Extension Study to Evaluate the Treatment Response and Safety of Two Amlitelimab Dose Regimens Administered as Monotherapy by Subcutaneous Injection in Participants Aged 12 Years and Older With Moderate-to-severe Atopic Dermatitis $162,377 6 payments
  4. A Phase 2/3 Study Investigating the Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Efficacy of Dupilumab in Patients Aged >=6 Months to <6 Years With Severe Atopic Dermatitis $161,525 26 payments
  5. A Phase 3, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics (PK) of Baricitinib in Children From 6 Years to Less Than 18 Years of Age With Alopecia Areata $101,582 2 payments
  6. An Open-Label, Single-Arm Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Lebrikizumab in Adolescent Patients With Moderate-To-Severe Atopic Dermatitis $90,048 2 payments
  7. A Phase 3, Multi-center, Open-label, Single-arm Study to Assess the Safety of Apremilast (AMG 407) in Pediatric Participants From 6 Through 17 Years of Age With Mild to Moderate Plaque Psoriasis $77,178 1 payment
  8. A Phase 3 Randomized Doubleblind Placebocontrolled Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Ritlecitinib in Pediatric Participants 6 to Less Than 12 Years of Age With Severe Alopecia Areata $75,696 4 payments
  9. A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Ruxolitinib Cream in Pediatric Participants With Nonsegmental Vitiligo $73,840 18 payments
  10. An Interventional PK PD Phase 1 Openlabel Study to Investigate PK and PD of Multipledose Ritlecitinib in Children 6 to Less Than 12 Years of Age With Severe Alopecia Areata $72,987 9 payments

What you are looking at

A noncovered recipient is an organisation paid for research that is neither an individual clinician nor a teaching hospital — typically a contract research organisation, a foundation or a trial site network. They receive 81% of all reported research money, which is why they appear here at all.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record