Organisation paid for research Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Om Research LLC

Neither a doctor nor a teaching hospital

Research payments

$4,949,403

1,296 payments

Through program year 2025, Om Research LLC is reported as receiving $4,949,403 in research payments, across 1,296 payments.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $1,648,996 550
2024 Research $999,318 251
2023 Research $835,408 218
2022 Research $593,680 132
2021 Research $256,127 43
2020 Research $311,744 63
2019 Research $304,129 39

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH $508,096 267 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $452,229 102 payments
  3. Genentech, Inc. $449,984 106 payments
  4. Eli Lilly and Company $420,599 39 payments
  5. Janssen Research & Development, LLC $403,547 82 payments
  6. Allergan Inc. $370,974 68 payments
  7. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $349,482 156 payments
  8. Sanofi US Services Inc. $310,352 50 payments
  9. Pfizer Inc. $289,047 125 payments
  10. Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc. $240,631 10 payments
Studies the money was for Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre, Phase III trial evaluating long-term efficacy and safety of survodutide weekly injections in adult participants with noncirrhotic non-alcoholic steatohepatitis/metabolic associated steatohepatitis (NASH/MASH) and (F2) - (F3) stage of liver fibrosis $479,253 225 payments
  2. Roche Cancer Screening Collection Study $382,209 71 payments
  3. A Study to Assess Adverse Events and Change in Disease Activity of Risankizumab Subcutaneous Induction Treatment for Moderately to Severely Active Crohn s Disease $258,582 53 payments
  4. A Phase 2a/b, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Amlitelimab in Adult Patients With Nonresponsive Celiac Disease as an Adjunct to a Gluten-free Diet $243,946 37 payments
  5. A Study of TAK-062 in Treatment of Active Celiac Disease in Participants Attempting a Gluten-Free Diet $241,321 102 payments
  6. A Phase 3, Randomized Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Guselkumab Subcutaneous Induction Therapy in Participants with Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis $183,961 56 payments
  7. A PHASE 3, Double-Blind, Randomized, Two-Phase, Active-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Tegoprazan in Patients with Erosive Esophagitis $172,557 37 payments
  8. A Phase 2 Randomized Doubleblind Doubledummy Placebocontrolled Doseranging Dosefinding Parallel Group Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of Pf06865571 Dgat2i Alone and When Coadministered With Pf05221304 Acci in Adult Participants With Biopsyconfirmed Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis and Fibrosis Stage 2 Or 3 $143,174 24 payments
  9. A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind Trial of Fixed-Dose Brexpiprazole As Combination Therapy With Sertraline in the Treatment of Adults With Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder $138,258 3 payments
  10. A Multicenter Randomized Doubleblind Parallelgroup Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Oral Etrasimod As Induction and Maintenance Therapy for Moderately to Severely Active Crohns Disease $128,147 82 payments
What the money was spent on Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Patient care $115,183 59 payments

Only reported on some payments, and a payment can report more than one category, so these amounts overlap.

What you are looking at

A noncovered recipient is an organisation paid for research that is neither an individual clinician nor a teaching hospital — typically a contract research organisation, a foundation or a trial site network. They receive 81% of all reported research money, which is why they appear here at all.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record