Organisation paid for research Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

NYC Research Inc

Neither a doctor nor a teaching hospital

Research payments

$3,369,736

801 payments

Through program year 2025, NYC Research Inc is reported as receiving $3,369,736 in research payments, across 801 payments.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $975,820 24
2024 Research $898,703 27
2023 Research $671,871 200
2022 Research $388,391 124
2021 Research $166,249 194
2020 Research $105,138 138
2019 Research $163,565 94

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Eli Lilly and Company $2,478,829 38 payments
  2. Novo Nordisk AS $438,118 727 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $330,118 22 payments
  4. Mannkind Corporation $110,472 13 payments
  5. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $12,200 1 payment
Studies the money was for Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. A Phase 3 Randomized Double Blind Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Once Daily Oral Ly3502970 Compared With Placebo in Adult Participants With Obesity Or Overweight and Type 2 Diabetes (Attain-2) $572,447 4 payments
  2. A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Parallel-Design, Open-Label Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Ly3209590 Compared With Insulin Degludec in Participants With Type 2 Diabetes Currently Treated With Basal Insulin (Qwint-3) $357,544 5 payments
  3. A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Tirzepatide Once Weekly Compared to Placebo in Adult Participants With Type 1 Diabetes and Obesity Or Overweight (Surpass-T1d-1) $270,306 1 payment
  4. Nn9535-4352 $261,702 669 payments
  5. A Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Oral Armour Thyroid Compared to Synthetic T4 for the Treatment of Primary Hypothyroidism in Adult Participants $258,238 16 payments
  6. A Phase 3, Randomized, Multicenter, Open-Label Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Retatrutide Once Weekly Compared With Semaglutide Once Weekly in Adult Participants With Type 2 Diabetes and Inadequate Glycemic Control With Metformin With Or Without Sglt2 Inhibitor (Transcend-T2d-2) $244,580 4 payments
  7. A Phase 3 Multicenter Randomized Parallel-Design Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Ly3209590 As A Weekly Basal Insulin Compared With Insulin Degludec in Participants With Type 1 Diabetes Treated With Multiple Daily Injection Therapy $210,739 2 payments
  8. A Phase 3 Multicenter Randomized Parallel-Design Open-Label Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Ly3209590 Compared With Insulin Degludec in Participants With Type 2 Diabetes Currently Treated With Basal Insulin (Qwint-3) $202,876 2 payments
  9. Nn9536-4376 $140,971 36 payments
  10. A Phase 3, Randomized, Multicenter, Double-Blind Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Retatrutide Once Weekly Compared With Placebo in Adult Participants With Type 2 Diabetes, Moderate Or Severe Renal Impairment With Inadequate Glycemic Control on Basal Insulin With Or Without Metformin And/Or Sglt2 Inhibitor $128,356 4 payments

What you are looking at

A noncovered recipient is an organisation paid for research that is neither an individual clinician nor a teaching hospital — typically a contract research organisation, a foundation or a trial site network. They receive 81% of all reported research money, which is why they appear here at all.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record