Organisation paid for research Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Midwest Clinical Research

Neither a doctor nor a teaching hospital

Research payments

$4,418,557

117 payments

Through program year 2025, Midwest Clinical Research is reported as receiving $4,418,557 in research payments, across 117 payments.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $413,441 24
2024 Research $821,032 24
2023 Research $442,792 14
2022 Research $908,614 12
2021 Research $1,237,256 10
2020 Research $129,564 21
2019 Research $465,858 12

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $2,909,854 34 payments
  2. AstraZeneca UK Limited $823,732 7 payments
  3. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $462,636 55 payments
  4. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $206,829 8 payments
  5. Indivior Inc. $15,506 13 payments
Studies the money was for Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. A Phase III Randomized Double-blind Placebo-controlled Multi-center Study in Adults to Determine the Safety and Efficacy of AZD7442 a Combination Product of Two Monoclonal Antibodies (AZD8895 and AZD1061) for Pre-exposure Prophylaxis of COVID-19 $2,144,461 5 payments
  2. A Randomised Placebo-Controlled Double-Blind Multi-Centre 4-week 3-way Crossover Pharmacodynamic Study to Assess the Equivalence of Budesonide Glycopyrronium and Formoterol Fumarate (BGF) Delivered by MDI HFO Compared with BGF Delivered by MDI HFA in Participants with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease $309,403 3 payments
  3. A Randomized, Double-Blind, 12-Week (with an Extension to 52 Weeks in a subset of Participants), Multi-Center Study to Assess the Safety of Budesonide, Glycopyrronium, and Formoterol Fumarate (BGF) $270,195 5 payments
  4. A Randomized Double Blind Double Dummy Parallel Group Multicenter 24 to 52 Week Variable Length Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Budesonide Glycopyrronium and Formoterol Fumarate Metered Dose Inhaler $260,890 10 payments
  5. A Randomized Double-Blind Parallel Group Multi-Center 24-Week Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Three Doses of PT001 to Placebo and Open-label Spiriva Respimat in Subjects With Persistent Asthma $219,903 4 payments
  6. A Phase 3, 52-Week, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Para $180,470 26 payments
  7. A Phase IV, 12 Week, Randomised, Double Blind Study to Compare Single $156,825 8 payments
  8. A Phase II Randomized Openlabel Multicenter Doseranging Study in Adults and Pediatric Individuals 2265 12 years of Age to Assess the Safety Immunogenicity Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of AZD7442 a Combination Product of Two Monoclonal Antibodies Tixagevimab and Cilgavimab for Pre-exposure Prophylaxis of COVID19 $155,125 3 payments
  9. A Phase II, Randomized, Double-blind, Single-dose, Placebo-controlled, 3-Period, 3-Treatment, Crossover, Multicenter Study to Compare the Bronchodilatory Effect and Safety of PT007 AS MDI to Placebo MDI and Open-Label Ventolin Evohaler in Adult Participants with Asthma MITCHELL $125,341 1 payment
  10. A Multi Center Randomized Double Blind Active and Placebo Controlled Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Ligelizumab Qge031 in the Treatment of Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria Csu in Adolescents and Adults Inadequately Controlled With H1 Antihis $108,539 3 payments

What you are looking at

A noncovered recipient is an organisation paid for research that is neither an individual clinician nor a teaching hospital — typically a contract research organisation, a foundation or a trial site network. They receive 81% of all reported research money, which is why they appear here at all.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record