Organisation paid for research Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Midlantic Urology

Neither a doctor nor a teaching hospital

Research payments

$13,248,516

806 payments

Through program year 2025, Midlantic Urology is reported as receiving $13,248,516 in research payments, across 806 payments.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $868,088 25
2024 Research $1,768,556 172
2023 Research $2,170,614 187
2022 Research $3,404,360 84
2021 Research $2,495,318 37
2020 Research $2,100,952 172
2019 Research $440,626 129

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $11,877,021 386 payments
  2. Blue Earth Diagnostics Limited $856,028 124 payments
  3. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $493,734 290 payments
  4. Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. $21,733 6 payments
Studies the money was for Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. A Phase 3, Randomized, Comparator-controlled Clinical Trial to Study the Efficacy and Safety of Pembrolizumab MK-3475 in Combination with Bacillus Calmette- Guerin BCG in Participants with High-risk Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer HR NMIBC that is either Persistent or Recurrent Following BCG Induction or that is Na to BCG Treatment KEYNOTE-676 $3,480,704 11 payments
  2. A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Trial of Pembrolizumab MK-3475 Plus Enzalutamide Plus ADT Versus Placebo Plus Enzalutamide Plus ADT in Participants With Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer mHSPC KEYNOTE-991 $2,830,663 21 payments
  3. A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Trial of Pembrolizumab MK-3475 Plus Enzalutamide Plus ADT Versus Placebo Plus Enzalutamide Plus ADT in Participants With Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer mHSPC KEYNOTE-991 $1,106,736 20 payments
  4. A Phase 3, Randomized, Comparator-controlled Clinical Trial to Study the Efficacy and Safety of Pembrolizumab MK-3475 in Combination with Bacillus Calmette- Guerin BCG in Participants with High-risk Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer HR NMIBC that is either Persistent or Recurrent Following BCG Induction or that is Na ve to BCG Treatment KEYNOTE-676 $933,991 15 payments
  5. A Phase 3, Randomized, Open-label Study to Evaluate Perioperative Enfortumab Vedotin Plus Pembrolizumab MK-3475 Versus Neoadjuvant Gemcitabine and Cisplatin in Cisplatin-eligible Participants with Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer KEYNOTE-B15 , EV-304 $629,814 13 payments
  6. Role of rhPSMA-7.3 PET/CT Imaging in Men With High-Risk Prostate Cancer Following Conventional Imaging and Associated Changes in Medical Management $548,591 111 payments
  7. A Phase 3, Randomized, Comparator-controlled Clinical Trial to Study the Efficacy and Safety of Pembrolizumab MK-3475 in Combination with Bacillus Calmette- Guerin BCG in Participants with High-risk Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer HR NMIBC that is either Persistent or Recurrent Following BCG Induction or that is Na ve to BCG Treatment KEYNOTE-676 $395,411 21 payments
  8. A Phase III, Randomized, Double-blind, Matching Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial to Study the Efficacy and Safety of Pembrolizumab MK-3475 in Combination With Chemoradiotherapy CRT versus CRT Alone in Participants with Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer MIBC KEYNOTE-992 $377,166 13 payments
  9. A Multicenter, Double-blind, Randomized Phase 3 Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Belzutifan MK-6482 Plus Pembrolizumab MK-3475 Versus Placebo Plus Pembrolizumab, in the Adjuvant Treatment of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma ccRCC Post Nephrectomy MK-6482-022 $337,403 3 payments
  10. A Multi-center, Double-Blind, Randomized Phase 3 Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Belzutifan MK-6482 plus Pembrolizumab MK- 3475 Versus Placebo plus Pembrolizumab, in the Adjuvant Treatment of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma ccRCC Post Nephrectomy 6482-022 $318,603 8 payments

What you are looking at

A noncovered recipient is an organisation paid for research that is neither an individual clinician nor a teaching hospital — typically a contract research organisation, a foundation or a trial site network. They receive 81% of all reported research money, which is why they appear here at all.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record