Organisation paid for research Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Keystone Clinical Studies LLC

Neither a doctor nor a teaching hospital

Research payments

$9,631,375

677 payments

Through program year 2025, Keystone Clinical Studies LLC is reported as receiving $9,631,375 in research payments, across 677 payments.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $2,454,533 131
2024 Research $818,550 56
2023 Research $1,718,715 72
2022 Research $1,489,954 72
2021 Research $943,345 62
2020 Research $1,274,930 65
2019 Research $931,349 219

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Eisai Inc. $4,671,291 369 payments
  2. Janssen Research & Development, LLC $3,056,274 147 payments
  3. Sage Therapeutics, Inc. $907,027 72 payments
  4. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. $432,806 18 payments
  5. AbbVie, Inc. $217,584 30 payments
  6. Allergan Inc. $172,502 31 payments
  7. Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc. $91,787 2 payments
  8. Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. $42,640 2 payments
  9. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $34,864 5 payments
  10. H. Lundbeck A S $4,600 1 payment
Studies the money was for Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. A Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, 18-Month Study With an Open-Label Extension Phase to Confirm Safety and Efficacy of BAN2401 in Subjects With Early Alzheimer's Disease $2,930,561 95 payments
  2. A Randomized Double blind Placebo controlled Parallel group Multi Center Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of JNJ63733657 an Antitau Monoclonal Antibody in Participants with Early Alzheimer's Disease $1,732,837 84 payments
  3. A Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group Study, to Assess Efficacy, Safety and Immunogenicity of JNJ-64042056, a Phosphorylated Tau Targeted Active Immunotherapy, in Participants with Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease $1,269,367 57 payments
  4. A Phase 3, Open-Label, 1-Year Study of the Safety, Tolerability, and Need for Re-Treatment With Sage-217 in Adult Subjects With Major Depressive Disorder $648,082 55 payments
  5. A Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Parallel-Treatment Arm, 216 Week Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Treatment With BAN2401 in Subjects With Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease and Elevated Amyloid (A45 Trial) and in Subjects With Early Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease and Intermediate Amyloid (A3 Trial) $536,515 33 payments
  6. A Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, 24-Month Study With an Open-Label Extension Phase to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Elenbecestat (E2609) in Subjects With Early Alzheimer's Disease $508,926 192 payments
  7. AHEAD 3-45 Study: A Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Parallel-Treatment Arm, 216 Week Study With an Extension Phase to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Treatment With BAN2401 in Subjects With Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease and Elevated Amyloid (A45 Trial) and in Subjects With Early Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease and Intermediate Amyloid (A3 Trial) $436,855 24 payments
  8. A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Risperidone Extended-Release Injectable Suspension (TV-46000) for Subcutaneous Use as Maintenance Treatment in Adult and Adolescent Patients With Schizophrenia $432,806 18 payments
  9. A Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Treatment With Lecanemab in Participants With Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease and Elevated Amyloid and Also in Participants With Early Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease and Intermediate Amyloid $209,995 18 payments
  10. A Comparative Study of Sage-217 Plus Sertraline Versus Placebo Plus Sertraline in Adults With Major Depressive Disorder $158,960 12 payments
What the money was spent on Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Other $34,864 5 payments

Only reported on some payments, and a payment can report more than one category, so these amounts overlap.

What you are looking at

A noncovered recipient is an organisation paid for research that is neither an individual clinician nor a teaching hospital — typically a contract research organisation, a foundation or a trial site network. They receive 81% of all reported research money, which is why they appear here at all.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record