Organisation paid for research Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Imaging Endpoints II LLC

Neither a doctor nor a teaching hospital

Research payments

$1,261,236

88 payments

Through program year 2025, Imaging Endpoints II LLC is reported as receiving $1,261,236 in research payments, across 88 payments.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $396,772 36
2024 Research $331,010 13
2023 Research $263,975 23
2022 Research $11,900 4
2021 Research $16,000 1
2020 Research $15,425 1
2019 Research $226,155 10

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Sage Therapeutics, Inc. $358,223 6 payments
  2. Genzyme Corporation $277,492 36 payments
  3. Ucb SA $222,662 4 payments
  4. Eli Lilly and Company $138,276 3 payments
  5. Genentech, Inc. $56,329 5 payments
  6. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $54,205 21 payments
  7. Amgen Inc. $42,950 1 payment
  8. UCB, Inc. $41,007 1 payment
  9. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $20,600 3 payments
  10. Gilead Sciences, Inc. $15,425 1 payment
Studies the money was for Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Study to Evaluate SAGE-324 in Participants With Essential Tremors $214,946 3 payments
  2. A Multicenter Phase 2, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized, Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Ucb0022 in Study Participants With Advanced Parkinsons Disease $199,400 4 payments
  3. A Study to Evaluate the Long-term Safety and Tolerability of SAGE-324 in Participants With Essential Tremor $143,277 3 payments
  4. A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled and Delayed-Start Study of Ly3314814 in Mild Alzheimers Disease Dementia $138,276 3 payments
  5. A Randomized, Double-blind, Phase 3 Study Comparing Efficacy and Safety of Frexalimab (SAR441344) to Placebo in Adult Participants With Nonrelapsing Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis $124,138 11 payments
  6. Master Protocol of Two Independent, Randomized, Double-blind, Phase 3 Studies Comparing Efficacy and Safety of Frexalimab (SAR441344) to Teriflunomide in Adult Participants With Relapsing Forms of Multiple Sclerosis $117,245 23 payments
  7. A Multicenter Phase 2, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized, Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Ucb0022 in Study Participants With Advanced Parkinson's Disease $64,269 1 payment
  8. A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, 2-Period Crossover, Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Oral Tak-071 in Parkinson Disease Patients With Cognitive Impairment and An Elevated Risk of Falls $54,205 21 payments
  9. Prodromal to Mild Ad $46,329 4 payments
  10. A Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group Study to Compare Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, Clinical Effects, and Safety Between ABP 692 and Ocrevus (Ocrelizumab) in Subjects With Relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis $42,950 1 payment
What the money was spent on Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Overhead $11,900 2 payments

Only reported on some payments, and a payment can report more than one category, so these amounts overlap.

What you are looking at

A noncovered recipient is an organisation paid for research that is neither an individual clinician nor a teaching hospital — typically a contract research organisation, a foundation or a trial site network. They receive 81% of all reported research money, which is why they appear here at all.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record