Organisation paid for research Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Houston Methodist Hospital

Neither a doctor nor a teaching hospital

Research payments

$4,104,145

276 payments

Through program year 2025, Houston Methodist Hospital is reported as receiving $4,104,145 in research payments, across 276 payments.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $743,815 60
2024 Research $361,081 28
2023 Research $378,847 34
2022 Research $499,505 35
2021 Research $829,599 23
2020 Research $790,017 32
2019 Research $501,282 64

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $1,552,692 34 payments
  2. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $1,113,160 20 payments
  3. Pfizer Inc. $504,433 28 payments
  4. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $239,363 22 payments
  5. Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH $151,536 10 payments
  6. Shockwave Medical, Inc $106,281 11 payments
  7. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $98,736 17 payments
  8. Incyte Corporation $77,459 76 payments
  9. TransMedics, Inc. $60,748 19 payments
  10. Roche Diagnostics Operations, Inc. $51,954 8 payments
Studies the money was for Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. A Phase 3 Openlabel Study of Elranatamab Monotherapy Versus Elotuzumab Pomalidomide Dexamethasone Epd Or Pomalidomide Bortezomib Dexamethasone PVD Or Carfilzomib Dexamethasone KD in Participants With Relapsedrefractory Multiple Myeloma Who Received Prior Anticd38 Directed Therapy $493,227 23 payments
  2. Liver Transplant Patients $416,047 2 payments
  3. Phase II Window of Opportunity Trial of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy and In Situ Gene Therapy Followed by Pembrolizumab in Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer and Metastatic Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer $398,829 2 payments
  4. Phase II Window of Opportunity Trial of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy and In Situ Gene Therapy Followed by Pembrolizumab in Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer and Metastatic Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer $331,166 2 payments
  5. A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Study, Comparing Nis793 in Combination With Gemcitabine and Nab-Paclitaxel Versus (VS.) Placebo Combined With Gemcitabine and Nab-Paclitaxel for First Line Treatment of Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (MPD $199,925 1 payment
  6. An Open-label, Multicenter, Phase 3 Randomized, Active-Comparator-Controlled Clinical Study of Pembrolizumab MK-3475 in Combination With Sacituzumab Govitecan Versus MK-3475 Monotherapy as First-line Treatment in Participants With PD L1 TPS Greater than or Equal to 50 Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer KEYNOTE D46,EVOKE-03. $191,075 3 payments
  7. A Phase 2,3 Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Pharmacokinetics of MK-4482 in Hospitalized Adults with COVID-19 $185,785 4 payments
  8. A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase II Study of Canakinumab Or Pembrolizumab As Monotherapy Or in Combination As Neoadjuvant Therapy in Subjects With Resectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (Canopy-N) $155,692 3 payments
  9. Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Once-Daily Zortress (Everolimus) and Extended-Release Tacrolimus in Rental Transplant Recipients $150,225 2 payments
  10. Proof of Clinical Principal in Crohn?s Disease $133,577 8 payments
What the money was spent on Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Non-patient care $12,950 1 payment

Only reported on some payments, and a payment can report more than one category, so these amounts overlap.

What you are looking at

A noncovered recipient is an organisation paid for research that is neither an individual clinician nor a teaching hospital — typically a contract research organisation, a foundation or a trial site network. They receive 81% of all reported research money, which is why they appear here at all.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record