Organisation paid for research Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Helios Clinical Research

Neither a doctor nor a teaching hospital

Research payments

$903,181

170 payments

Through program year 2025, Helios Clinical Research is reported as receiving $903,181 in research payments, across 170 payments.

By program year

3 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $502,058 140
2024 Research $340,522 17
2023 Research $60,601 13

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2023–2025
  1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $244,543 16 payments
  2. Roche Molecular Systems, Inc. $228,832 19 payments
  3. Ipsen Innovation $203,771 119 payments
  4. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $108,319 7 payments
  5. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $87,634 4 payments
  6. AstraZeneca UK Limited $17,705 1 payment
  7. Celgene Corporation $11,920 1 payment
  8. Epizyme, Inc., $250 1 payment
  9. Moderna TX, Inc. $207 2 payments
Studies the money was for Research payments · program years 2023–2025
  1. Rd006493 $228,832 19 payments
  2. A Phase III, Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter, Parallel-group Study With Extension Phase to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Dysport for the Prevention of Episodic Migraine in Adult Participants $104,047 66 payments
  3. Phase III, Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter, Parallel-group Study with Extension Phase to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Dysport for the Prevention of Chronic Migraine in Adult Participants $99,724 53 payments
  4. A Phase III, Multicentre, Randomised, Double-blind, Chronic-dosing, Parallel-group, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Tozorakimab in Participants with Symptomatic Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) with a History of COPD Exacerbations (MIRANDA) $65,417 4 payments
  5. A PHASE 3, TWO-STAGE, RANDOMIZED, MULTICENTER, OPEN-LABEL STUDY COMPARING CC-92480 (BMS-986348), CARFILZOMIB AND DEXAMETHASONE (480Kd) VERSUS CARFILZOMIB AND DEXAMETHASONE (Kd) IN PARTICIPANTS WITH RELAPSED OR REFRACTORY MULTIPLE MYELOMA (RRMM). $60,516 1 payment
  6. A Randomized DoubleBlind Parallel Group Multi Center Phase III Study to Assess the Efficacy of Budesonide Glycopyrronium and Formoterol Fumarate MeterednDose Inhaler Relative to Glycopyrronium and Formoterol Fumarate MDI on Cardiopulmonary Outcomes in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease THARROS $52,049 4 payments
  7. a phase 3,global,randomized,modified double blind,placebo controlled,study to evaluate the efficacy,immunogenicity,and safety of IVX A12,a respiratory syncytial virus RSV and human metapneumovirus hMPV virus like particle VLP vaccine in adults 60 years of age and older $49,614 3 payments
  8. A Phase 3, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double Blind Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Molnupiravir MK-4482 in Non-Hospitalized Adults with COVID-19 at High Risk for Disease Progression $39,954 3 payments
  9. Phase III Study of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (T-DXd) with or without Pertuzumab versus Taxane Trastuzumab and Pertuzumab in HER2-positive First-line Metastatic Breast Cancer (DESTINY-Breast09) $36,620 1 payment
  10. A Phase 3, Randomized, Open-label Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of sac-TMT Sacituzumab Tirumotecan, MK-2870 Followed by Carboplatin,Paclitaxel vs Chemotherapy, Both in Combination With Pembrolizumab as Neoadjuvant Therapy for High-Risk, Earl $35,345 1 payment

What you are looking at

A noncovered recipient is an organisation paid for research that is neither an individual clinician nor a teaching hospital — typically a contract research organisation, a foundation or a trial site network. They receive 81% of all reported research money, which is why they appear here at all.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record