Organisation paid for research Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Neither a doctor nor a teaching hospital

Research payments

$32,579,214

1,013 payments

Through program year 2025, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center is reported as receiving $32,579,214 in research payments, across 1,013 payments.

By program year

4 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $12,196,520 393
2024 Research $10,817,342 322
2023 Research $8,587,237 262
2022 Research $978,116 36

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2022–2025
  1. BeiGene, Ltd. $9,529,126 211 payments
  2. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $7,509,169 15 payments
  3. Sanofi US Services Inc. $3,186,279 40 payments
  4. BeOne Medicines Ltd. $2,679,399 28 payments
  5. AstraZeneca UK Limited $1,181,526 5 payments
  6. Celgene Corporation $1,128,901 18 payments
  7. Taiho Oncology, Inc. $810,016 15 payments
  8. Pfizer Inc. $735,196 30 payments
  9. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co.KG $685,799 15 payments
  10. Incyte Corporation $631,010 101 payments
Studies the money was for Research payments · program years 2022–2025
  1. A Phase 2, Multicenter, Single-arm Study of Zanubrutinib (BGB-3111) in Patients With Previously Treated B-Cell Lymphoma Intolerant of Prior Treatment With Ibrutinib and/or Acalabrutinib $6,673,182 66 payments
  2. Acalabrutinib for chronic graft versus host disease ESR1813995 $3,988,046 6 payments
  3. Acalabrutinib in combination with Venetoclax for previously treated CLL or small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) $2,808,470 4 payments
  4. Pooled Study for Isatuximab $2,791,779 28 payments
  5. A Phase 1a/1b Open-Label Dose Escalation and Expansion Study of Bcl-2 Inhibitor BGB-11417 in Patients With Mature B-Cell Malignancies $1,873,830 100 payments
  6. A Phase 1/1b Open-Label Dose Escalation and Expansion Study of Bcl-2 Inhibitor BGB-11417 in Patients with Mature B-Cell Malignancies $1,356,793 52 payments
  7. A Phase 3, Open-Label, Randomized Study of Sonrotoclax (BGB-11417) Plus Zanubrutinib (BGB-3111) Compared With Venetoclax Plus Obinutuzumab in Patients With Previously Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia $1,049,572 3 payments
  8. A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 3 Clinical Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Tislelizumab (BGB-A317) Plus Platinum and Fluoropyrimidine Versus Placebo Plus Platinum and Fluoropyrimidine as First-Line Treatment in Patients Wi $878,317 18 payments
  9. A Phase I-III Randomized Double blind Study to Evaluate the Safety and Neutralizing Activity of AZD5156-AZD3152 for Pre exposure Prophylaxis of COVID 19 in Participants with Conditions Causing Immune Impairment $863,496 3 payments
  10. A Multi-phase, Dose-Escalation Followed by an Open-label, Randomized, Crossover Study of Oral ASTX030 (Cedazuridine and Azacitidine Given in Combination) Versus Subcutaneous Azacitidine in Subjects With Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS), Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML), or Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) $700,563 11 payments
What the money was spent on Research payments · program years 2022–2025
  1. Patient care $441,038 50 payments

Only reported on some payments, and a payment can report more than one category, so these amounts overlap.

What you are looking at

A noncovered recipient is an organisation paid for research that is neither an individual clinician nor a teaching hospital — typically a contract research organisation, a foundation or a trial site network. They receive 81% of all reported research money, which is why they appear here at all.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record