Organisation paid for research Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Forest Hills Dermatology Group

Neither a doctor nor a teaching hospital

Research payments

$1,660,017

586 payments

Through program year 2025, Forest Hills Dermatology Group is reported as receiving $1,660,017 in research payments, across 586 payments.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $91,644 87
2024 Research $371,001 170
2023 Research $84,458 43
2022 Research $83,429 72
2021 Research $173,698 90
2020 Research $209,204 55
2019 Research $646,583 69

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Incyte Corporation $473,699 304 payments
  2. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $395,401 4 payments
  3. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $252,276 102 payments
  4. AbbVie, Inc. $135,661 27 payments
  5. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $118,799 67 payments
  6. Pfizer Inc. $72,248 25 payments
  7. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $59,695 7 payments
  8. Amgen Inc. $50,617 11 payments
  9. Ucb SA $26,192 7 payments
  10. Dermavant Sciences, Inc. $18,682 22 payments
Studies the money was for Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. A Randomized Double Blind Multicenter Study Assessing Short 16 Weeks and Long Term Efficacy Up to 1 Year Safety and Tolerability of Subcutaneous Secukinumab in Subjects of Body Weight 90 KG Or Higher With Moderate to Severe Chronic Plaque Type Psoriasis $390,861 2 payments
  2. A Phase 2, Double-Blind, Randomized, 16-Week, Vehicle-Controlled, Efficacy and Safety Study of Ruxolitinib Cream Followed by an Open-Label Extension Period in Adults With Chronic Hand Eczema $290,912 59 payments
  3. A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Dupilumab Administered Concomitantly With Topical Corticosteroids in Patients, 6 Years to 12 Years of Age, With Severe Atopic Dermatitis $60,519 8 payments
  4. M15-997 $58,997 11 payments
  5. An Open-Label Extension Study to Assess the Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Dupilumab in Patients 6 Months to 18 Years of Age With Atopic Dermatitis $58,510 11 payments
  6. An Open-Label Extension Study to Assess the Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Dupilumab in Patients >=6 Months to <18 Years of Age With Atopic Dermatitis $45,689 37 payments
  7. A Phase 3, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Efficacy and Safety Study of Povorcitinib (INCB054707) in Participants With Moderate to Severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa $43,698 87 payments
  8. A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel- Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Dupilumab in Adult and Adolescent Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Hand and Foot Dermatitis $43,632 22 payments
  9. Efficacy and Safety Study of Tildrakizumab in the Treatment of Nail Psoriasis $42,468 30 payments
  10. A multicenter, open Label study to assess the safety and efficacy of risankizumab for maintenance in moderate to severe plaque type psoriasis (LIMMITLESS) $38,122 7 payments
What the money was spent on Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Professional salary support $37,532 10 payments

Only reported on some payments, and a payment can report more than one category, so these amounts overlap.

What you are looking at

A noncovered recipient is an organisation paid for research that is neither an individual clinician nor a teaching hospital — typically a contract research organisation, a foundation or a trial site network. They receive 81% of all reported research money, which is why they appear here at all.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record