Organisation paid for research Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Epic Medical Research LLC

Neither a doctor nor a teaching hospital

Research payments

$7,966,745

362 payments

Through program year 2025, Epic Medical Research LLC is reported as receiving $7,966,745 in research payments, across 362 payments.

By program year

6 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $1,659,869 146
2024 Research $1,643,910 93
2023 Research $2,639,451 70
2022 Research $1,773,201 30
2021 Research $229,582 18
2019 Research $20,733 5

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Pfizer Inc. $6,114,879 151 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $911,074 3 payments
  3. Moderna TX, Inc. $391,910 93 payments
  4. Sanofi US Services Inc. $159,274 10 payments
  5. Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $138,388 27 payments
  6. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $120,735 41 payments
  7. Genentech, Inc. $48,447 14 payments
  8. Genzyme Corporation $36,609 2 payments
  9. Tolmar, Inc. $24,697 16 payments
  10. Bausch Health US, LLC $20,733 5 payments
Studies the money was for Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. A Phase 3 Randomized Observerblinded Study to Evaluate the Efficacy Safety Tolerability and Immunogenicity of A Modified Rna Vaccine Against Influenza Compared to Licensed Inactivated Influenza Vaccine in Healthy Adults 18 Years of Age Or Older $4,425,969 68 payments
  2. A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Maridebart Cafraglutide in Adult Participants Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Who Have Obesity or Are Overweight $849,074 1 payment
  3. A Phase 3 Master Protocol to Evaluate the Safety Tolerability and Immunogenicity of Respiratory Syncytial Virus RSV Prefusion F Subunit Vaccine in Adults at High Risk of Severe RSV Disease $643,313 22 payments
  4. A Phase 23 Randomized Doubleblind Doubledummy Placebo Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of 2 Regimens of Orally Administered PF 07321332Ritonavir in Preventing Symptomatic Sarscov2 Infection in Adult Household Contacts of An Individual With Symptomatic Covid19 $620,053 26 payments
  5. Study to Evaluate the Safety, Reactogenicity, and Immunogenicity of mRNA-1403 and mRNA-1405 to Prevent Norovirus Acute Gastroenteritis in Healthy Adults 18 to 80 Years of Age $245,034 55 payments
  6. A Phase 23 Protocol to Investigate the Safety Tolerability and Immunogenicity of Bnt162b2 Rnabased Vaccine Candidates for Sarscov2 New Variants in Healthy Individuals $226,347 17 payments
  7. A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Immunogenicity of mRNA-1647 Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Vaccine in Healthy Participants 16 to 40 Years of Age $146,876 38 payments
  8. A Multicenter Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase 2 Stu $120,735 41 payments
  9. An Interventional Efficacy and Safety Phase 23 Doubleblind 2 Arm Study to Investigate Orally Administered PF 07321332Ritonavir Compared With Placebo in Nonhospitalized Symptomatic Adult Participants With Covid19 Who Are at Low Risk of Progressing to Severe Illness $112,135 7 payments
  10. A Phase 2b/Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study, to investigate the efficacy and safety of lunsekimig in adult participants with inadequately controlled chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) characterized by an eosinophilic phenotype $82,176 6 payments
What the money was spent on Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Patient care $50,304 8 payments

Only reported on some payments, and a payment can report more than one category, so these amounts overlap.

What you are looking at

A noncovered recipient is an organisation paid for research that is neither an individual clinician nor a teaching hospital — typically a contract research organisation, a foundation or a trial site network. They receive 81% of all reported research money, which is why they appear here at all.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record