Organisation paid for research Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Elixia

Neither a doctor nor a teaching hospital

Research payments

$2,915,037

30 payments

Through program year 2025, Elixia is reported as receiving $2,915,037 in research payments, across 30 payments.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $694,927 13
2024 Research $2,116,068 12
2023 Research $57,846 2
2022 Research $45,644 2
2021 Research $552 1

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. AstraZeneca UK Limited $1,861,269 5 payments
  2. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $878,702 14 payments
  3. Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated $130,057 6 payments
  4. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $36,605 2 payments
  5. AbbVie, Inc. $4,355 2 payments
  6. Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $4,050 1 payment
Studies the money was for Research payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. A Phase I-III Randomized Double blind Study to Evaluate the Safety and Neutralizing Activity of AZD5156-AZD3152 for Pre exposure Prophylaxis of COVID 19 in Participants with Conditions Causing Immune Impairment $1,844,211 3 payments
  2. A Phase III, Randomised, Multicentre, Double-blind Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Zibotentan/Dapagliflozin FDC Compared to Dapagliflozin Alone in Participants with Chronic Kidney Disease and High Proteinuria $443,968 8 payments
  3. a phase 3,randomised,double blind,active controlled study to assess the efficacy,safety and tolerability of baxdrostat in combination with dapagliflozin compared with dapagliflozin alone on chronic kidney disease ckd progression in participants with ckd and high blood pressure $434,734 6 payments
  4. A Phase 2/3 Adaptive, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of VX-147 in Subjects Aged 18 Years and Older With APOL1-mediated Proteinuric Kidney Disease $99,632 3 payments
  5. Study to Assess Drug Levels and Safety of BMS-986278 in Healthy Participants and Participants With Different Degrees of Hepatic Impairment $35,245 1 payment
  6. A Study of the Prevalance of Apolipoprotein L1 (APOL1) Alleles Among Individuals With Proteinuric Kidney Disease Who Are of Recent African Ancestry or Geographic Origin $30,425 3 payments
  7. A Phase 2b multicentre randomized double-blind placebo-controlled parallel group dose ranging study to assess the efficacy safety and tolerability of zibotentan and dapagliflozin in patients with chronic kidney disease with estimated glomerular filtration rate eGFR between 20 and 60 mL min 1.73 m2 $17,057 2 payments
  8. a phase 3,randomized,double blind,placebo controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ravulizumab in adult participants with immunoglobulin a nephropathy IgAN $4,050 1 payment
  9. A Phase 2, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Fixed-Dose Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of ABBV-932 as an Adjunct to Antidepressant Therapies in the Treatment of Subjects with Generalized Anxiety Disorder who have had an Inadequate Response to Antidepressant Therapies $3,132 1 payment
  10. Study to Assess Drug Levels and Safety of BMS-986278 in Healthy Participants and Participants With Different Degrees of Hepatic Impairment $1,360 1 payment

What you are looking at

A noncovered recipient is an organisation paid for research that is neither an individual clinician nor a teaching hospital — typically a contract research organisation, a foundation or a trial site network. They receive 81% of all reported research money, which is why they appear here at all.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record