Organisation paid for research Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Eclipse Clinical Research

Neither a doctor nor a teaching hospital

Research payments

$4,738,252

310 payments

Through program year 2025, Eclipse Clinical Research is reported as receiving $4,738,252 in research payments, across 310 payments.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $2,632,144 41
2024 Research $770,675 30
2023 Research $175,495 41
2022 Research $183,818 30
2021 Research $165,918 49
2020 Research $230,714 47
2019 Research $579,488 72

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Eli Lilly and Company $2,404,386 3 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $521,415 14 payments
  3. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $322,544 42 payments
  4. Sanofi US Services Inc. $304,201 45 payments
  5. AbbVie, Inc. $243,269 24 payments
  6. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $220,673 15 payments
  7. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $165,763 24 payments
  8. Kowa Research Institute, Inc. $159,485 35 payments
  9. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $96,131 7 payments
  10. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $77,266 17 payments
Studies the money was for Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Investigate the Effect of Lepodisiran on the Reduction of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Adults With Elevated Lipoprotein(A) Who Have Established Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Or Are at Risk for A First Cardiovascular Event - Acclaim-Lp(A) $2,404,386 3 payments
  2. A Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Study Assessing Olpasiran Use to Prevent First Major Cardiovascular Events in Participants With Elevated Lipoprotein(a) $485,982 1 payment
  3. BAY1454032 Essure System for Permanent Birth Control $295,362 30 payments
  4. M16-100 $237,149 19 payments
  5. A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallelgroup, 3-arm, Multinational, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Amlitelimab Monotherapy by Subcutaneous Injection in Participants Aged 18 Years and Older With Moderate-to-severe Atopic Dermatitis $144,302 13 payments
  6. A Randomized Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Trial Assessing the Impact of Lipoprotein (A) Lowering With Tqj230 on Major Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Established Cardiovascular Disease $125,350 7 payments
  7. K-877-302 $107,396 18 payments
  8. A Phase 3, Multicenter, Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Safety and Immunogenicity of 2-dose Regimens of 9vHPV and mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines Where the First Dose of Each Vaccine Are Given Concomitantly in Boys and Girls 9 to 11 Years of Age $96,051 6 payments
  9. A Phase 3, Multinational, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group 48-week Extension Study to Evaluate the Treatment Response and Safety of Two Amlitelimab Dose Regimens Administered as Monotherapy by Subcutaneous Injection in Participants Aged 12 Years and Older With Moderate-to-severe Atopic Dermatitis $83,264 9 payments
  10. An Open-Label Extension Trial of the Phase III Lipid-Lowering Trials to Assess the Effect of Long Term Dosing of Inclisiran Given As Subcutaneous Injections in Subjects With High Cardiovascular Risk and Elevated LDL-C $62,294 4 payments
What the money was spent on Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Patient care $48,989 15 payments

Only reported on some payments, and a payment can report more than one category, so these amounts overlap.

What you are looking at

A noncovered recipient is an organisation paid for research that is neither an individual clinician nor a teaching hospital — typically a contract research organisation, a foundation or a trial site network. They receive 81% of all reported research money, which is why they appear here at all.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record