Organisation paid for research Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Dynamed Clinical Research LP

Neither a doctor nor a teaching hospital

Research payments

$154,522,028

28,257 payments

Through program year 2025, Dynamed Clinical Research LP is reported as receiving $154,522,028 in research payments, across 28,257 payments.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $23,921,566 2,763
2024 Research $23,952,343 1,341
2023 Research $45,218,725 18,861
2022 Research $37,356,343 1,881
2021 Research $17,298,734 1,074
2020 Research $2,914,956 818
2019 Research $3,859,361 1,519

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Moderna TX, Inc. $102,642,282 20,914 payments
  2. Pfizer Inc. $29,249,171 1,529 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $5,295,676 1,413 payments
  4. Bavarian Nordic A/S $3,847,142 464 payments
  5. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $3,199,250 1,026 payments
  6. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $1,761,956 522 payments
  7. Novavax Inc $1,595,510 141 payments
  8. Emergent BioSolutions Inc. $1,446,522 1,485 payments
  9. BioNTech SE $829,551 230 payments
  10. Janssen Research & Development, LLC $752,867 144 payments
Studies the money was for Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. A Phase 2/3, Randomized, Observer-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of mRNA-1345, an mRNA Vaccine Targeting Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV), in Adults 60 Years of Age $29,918,830 563 payments
  2. Phase 1/2, randomized, observer-blind, parallel, dose-ranging study to evaluate the safety,reactogenicity, and immunogenicity of mRNA-1018 pandemic influenza candidate vaccines inhealthy adults 18 years of age $7,455,434 3,172 payments
  3. A Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy Immunogenicity and Safety of Respiratory Syncytial Virus RSV Prefusion F Subunit Vaccine in Adults $6,681,458 276 payments
  4. A Phase 2/3, Two-Part, Open-Label, Dose Escalation, Age De-escalation and Randomized, Observer Blind, Placebo-Controlled Expansion Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Reactogenicity, and Effectiveness of mRNA 1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine in Health $6,188,813 220 payments
  5. A Phase 3, Randomized, Stratified, Observer-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Immunogenicity of mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine in Adults Aged 18 Years and Older $5,968,964 364 payments
  6. A Phase 2/3, Randomized, Observer-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety, Reactogenicity, and Effectiveness of mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine in Healthy Adolescents 12 to <18 years of age $5,830,777 134 payments
  7. A Study to Investigate the Safety and Efficacy of mRNA-1403 in Participants ?18 Years of Age for the Prevention of Acute Gastroenteritis $5,387,711 341 payments
  8. A Phase 2/3 Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity and Safety of mRNA Vaccine Boosters for SARS-CoV-2 Variants $4,599,923 204 payments
  9. A Phase 3, Randomized, Observer-blind, Active-controlled, Case-drivenStudy to Investigate the Safety, Efficacy, and Immunogenicity of mRNA-1010 Candidate Seasonal Influenza Vaccine Compared with a Licensed Inactivated Seasonal Influenza Vaccine in Adults 50 Years of Age $4,248,453 14 payments
  10. A Randomized, Observer-Blind, Active-Controlled Phase 3 Study to Investigate the Safety, Immunogenicity, and Relative Vaccine Efficacy of mRNA-1283.222 Administered as a Booster Dose Compared With mRNA-1273.222 in Participants Aged 12 Years and Older for the Prevention of COVID-19 $4,102,408 2,518 payments
What the money was spent on Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Patient care $572,375 171 payments
  2. Other $484,698 34 payments
  3. Professional salary support $13,500 1 payment

Only reported on some payments, and a payment can report more than one category, so these amounts overlap.

What you are looking at

A noncovered recipient is an organisation paid for research that is neither an individual clinician nor a teaching hospital — typically a contract research organisation, a foundation or a trial site network. They receive 81% of all reported research money, which is why they appear here at all.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record