Organisation paid for research Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

DM Clinical Research

Neither a doctor nor a teaching hospital

Research payments

$22,102,124

5,704 payments

Through program year 2025, DM Clinical Research is reported as receiving $22,102,124 in research payments, across 5,704 payments.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $87,265 165
2024 Research $9,930,705 475
2023 Research $5,217,491 657
2022 Research $3,490,353 4,148
2021 Research $2,807,326 178
2020 Research $568,912 77
2019 Research $72 4

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Moderna TX, Inc. $15,815,999 4,238 payments
  2. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $3,628,271 135 payments
  3. AstraZeneca UK Limited $947,114 13 payments
  4. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $596,453 24 payments
  5. Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. $541,967 551 payments
  6. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $154,009 4 payments
  7. Ucb SA $118,356 2 payments
  8. Pfizer Inc. $96,026 96 payments
  9. Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals International, plc $54,755 103 payments
  10. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $44,400 2 payments
Studies the money was for Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. A Phase 2/3, Randomized, Observer-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of mRNA-1345, an mRNA Vaccine Targeting Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV), in Adults 60 Years of Age $8,490,627 212 payments
  2. A Master Protocol Assessing the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Anti-Spike (S) SARS-CoV-2 Monoclonal Antibodies for the Treatment of Ambulatory Patients With COVID-19 $2,446,375 70 payments
  3. A Phase 3, Randomized, Observer-blind, Active-controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of mRNA-1010 Candidate Seasonal Influenza Vaccine in Adults 50 Years and Older $2,105,928 3,777 payments
  4. A Phase 3, Randomized, Stratified, Observer-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Immunogenicity of mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine in Adults Aged 18 Years and Older $1,111,494 17 payments
  5. A multi-phase, adaptive, randomized, observer-blind, placebo- and active-control study to evaluate the safety, reactogenicity, and immunogenicity of mRNA-based influenza and SARS-CoV-2 multi-component vaccines in healthy adults $822,196 28 payments
  6. A Phase 3, randomized, stratified, observer-blind, active-controlled study to evaluate the immunogenicity, reactogenicity and safety of mRNA-1010 seasonal influenza vaccine in adults 18 years and older $711,933 16 payments
  7. A Phase 2b Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multi-Centre, Dose-Ranging Study of AZD5718 in Participants with Proteinuric Chronic Kidney Disease $674,000 5 payments
  8. A Phase 2 Study to Assess the Virologic Efficacy of REGN10933+REGN10987 Across Different Dose Regimens in Outpatients With SARS-CoV-2 Infection $663,724 37 payments
  9. A Phase 3, randomized, observerblind, activecontrol study to evaluate the safety, reactogenicity, and immunogenicity of mRNA1083 (SARSCoV2 and influenza) vaccine in healthy adult participants, 50 years of age. $538,345 19 payments
  10. A Phase 3, Randomized, Observer-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Immunogenicity of mRNA-1647 Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Vaccine in Healthy Participants 16 to 40 Years of Age $521,482 42 payments
What the money was spent on Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Other $3,969 57 payments

Only reported on some payments, and a payment can report more than one category, so these amounts overlap.

What you are looking at

A noncovered recipient is an organisation paid for research that is neither an individual clinician nor a teaching hospital — typically a contract research organisation, a foundation or a trial site network. They receive 81% of all reported research money, which is why they appear here at all.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record