Organisation paid for research Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Direct Helpers Research Center

Neither a doctor nor a teaching hospital

Research payments

$14,250,152

2,038 payments

Through program year 2025, Direct Helpers Research Center is reported as receiving $14,250,152 in research payments, across 2,038 payments.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $4,426,756 800
2024 Research $4,252,255 505
2023 Research $2,320,324 291
2022 Research $1,100,846 235
2021 Research $374,002 56
2020 Research $664,102 68
2019 Research $1,111,867 83

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $3,638,962 239 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $2,595,235 32 payments
  3. Incyte Corporation $1,157,607 940 payments
  4. Taro Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. $970,124 142 payments
  5. Exeltis, USA Inc. $930,645 28 payments
  6. Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc. $670,815 12 payments
  7. LEO Pharma AS $568,268 83 payments
  8. Dr.Reddy's Laboratories,Inc. $550,333 124 payments
  9. Chiesi USA, Inc. $488,347 164 payments
  10. Bausch Health US, LLC $445,756 13 payments
Studies the money was for Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. A Study About How Well TAK-279 Works and Its Safety in Participants With Moderate-to-severe Plaque Psoriasis During 52 Weeks of Treatment $1,691,526 66 payments
  2. LF111 or Drospirenone Chew vs Non-hormonal Contraceptive Methods on Bone Mineral Density in Adolescent and Adult Women $930,645 28 payments
  3. AMG 451 DDI/Atopic Dermatitis $780,836 3 payments
  4. Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized Study With 2 Different Doses of Prucalopride Administered to Male and Female Pediatric Subjects Aged 6 Months to 17 Years With Functional Constipation, Consisting of A 12-Week Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Part (Part A) to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety Followed By A 36-Week Double-Blind Extension Part (Part B) to Document Long-Term Safety Up to Week 48 $653,363 114 payments
  5. TAK-279-PsO-3003 A Phase 3, multi-center, open-label Study To Evaluate The Efficacy, Safety, And Tolerability of TAK-279 in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis $457,183 26 payments
  6. A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Dose Ranging, Parallel-group Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Plecanatide in Children 6 to <18 Years of Age with Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Constipation (IBS-C) $445,756 13 payments
  7. A Phase 0 Study to Assess Sleep Using Emerald Touchless Sensor in Healthy Subjects and Subjects with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis $419,277 1 payment
  8. TAK-279-PsO-3004 A Phase 3, multi-center, head to head Study To Evaluate The Efficacy, Safety, And Tolerability of TAK-279 in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis $413,737 13 payments
  9. A Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, and Placebo-Controlled Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Zasocitinib (TAK-279) in Subjects with Active Psoriatic Arthritis Stratified by Prior Biologic Use (LATITUDE-PsA-3002 $364,689 17 payments
  10. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib cream in participants with hidradenitis suppurativa. $361,604 193 payments
What the money was spent on Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Professional salary support $220,200 8 payments
  2. Other $8,000 2 payments
  3. Overhead $4,250 1 payment

Only reported on some payments, and a payment can report more than one category, so these amounts overlap.

What you are looking at

A noncovered recipient is an organisation paid for research that is neither an individual clinician nor a teaching hospital — typically a contract research organisation, a foundation or a trial site network. They receive 81% of all reported research money, which is why they appear here at all.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record