Organisation paid for research Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Cra Headlands LLC

Neither a doctor nor a teaching hospital

Research payments

$28,035,480

5,244 payments

Through program year 2025, Cra Headlands LLC is reported as receiving $28,035,480 in research payments, across 5,244 payments.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $5,212,594 370
2024 Research $6,127,171 233
2023 Research $8,546,265 4,321
2022 Research $4,083,865 184
2021 Research $3,936,305 123
2020 Research $121,143 8
2019 Research $8,138 5

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Moderna TX, Inc. $14,770,180 4,627 payments
  2. Pfizer Inc. $11,269,752 419 payments
  3. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $620,138 5 payments
  4. Novavax Inc $509,826 42 payments
  5. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $429,048 41 payments
  6. AbbVie, Inc. $322,726 72 payments
  7. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $111,816 36 payments
  8. ALK-Abello, Inc $1,995 2 payments
Studies the money was for Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. A Phase 2/3, Randomized, Observer-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of mRNA-1345, an mRNA Vaccine Targeting Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV), in Adults 60 Years of Age $2,981,819 80 payments
  2. A Phase 3, Randomized, Observer-blind, Active-controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of mRNA-1010 Candidate Seasonal Influenza Vaccine in Adults 50 Years and Older $2,674,516 2,662 payments
  3. A Phase 3 Randomized Observerblinded Study to Evaluate the Efficacy Safety Tolerability and Immunogenicity of A Modified Rna Vaccine Against Influenza Compared to Licensed Inactivated Influenza Vaccine in Healthy Adults 18 Years of Age Or Older $1,694,854 40 payments
  4. A Phase 123 Placebocontrolled Randomized Observerblind Dosefinding Study to Evaluate the Safety Tolerability Immunogenicity and Efficacy of Sarscov2 Rna Vaccine Candidates Against Covid19 in Healthy Adults $1,681,542 65 payments
  5. A Phase 2/3, Randomized, Observer-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety, Reactogenicity, and Effectiveness of mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine in Healthy Adolescents 12 to <18 years of age $1,633,412 62 payments
  6. A Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy Immunogenicity and Safety of Respiratory Syncytial Virus RSV Prefusion F Subunit Vaccine in Adults $1,288,611 58 payments
  7. A Phase 3 Master Protocol to Evaluate Additional Doses of Bnt162b2 in Healthy Individuals Previously Vaccinated With Bnt162b2 $1,143,543 29 payments
  8. A Study of mRNA-1010 Compared With a Licensed Influenza Vaccine in Adults ?50 Years of Age $1,021,246 42 payments
  9. A Phase 3, randomized, observerblind, activecontrol study to evaluate the safety, reactogenicity, and immunogenicity of mRNA1083 (SARSCoV2 and influenza) vaccine in healthy adult participants, 50 years of age. $817,686 25 payments
  10. A Phase 3, Randomized, Observer-blind, Active-controlled, Case-drivenStudy to Investigate the Safety, Efficacy, and Immunogenicity of mRNA-1010 Candidate Seasonal Influenza Vaccine Compared with a Licensed Inactivated Seasonal Influenza Vaccine in Adults 50 Years of Age $809,817 3 payments

What you are looking at

A noncovered recipient is an organisation paid for research that is neither an individual clinician nor a teaching hospital — typically a contract research organisation, a foundation or a trial site network. They receive 81% of all reported research money, which is why they appear here at all.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record