Organisation paid for research Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Clinical Trial Source LLC

Neither a doctor nor a teaching hospital

Research payments

$55,865,208

3,204 payments

Through program year 2025, Clinical Trial Source LLC is reported as receiving $55,865,208 in research payments, across 3,204 payments.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $80,375 25
2024 Research $8,101,740 133
2023 Research $5,551,780 253
2022 Research $21,101,412 780
2021 Research $12,457,864 903
2020 Research $4,571,515 617
2019 Research $4,000,522 493

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Pfizer Inc. $18,909,355 400 payments
  2. Moderna TX, Inc. $17,978,262 176 payments
  3. Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc. $2,699,350 72 payments
  4. Eli Lilly and Company $2,160,187 76 payments
  5. Sage Therapeutics, Inc. $1,505,108 205 payments
  6. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $1,502,796 259 payments
  7. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,454,376 84 payments
  8. Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $1,083,903 167 payments
  9. AbbVie, Inc. $936,109 251 payments
  10. Sanofi US Services Inc. $926,694 186 payments
Studies the money was for Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. A Phase 2/3, Randomized, Observer-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of mRNA-1345, an mRNA Vaccine Targeting Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV), in Adults 60 Years of Age $17,951,888 165 payments
  2. A Phase 3 Randomized Doubleblinded Placebocontrolled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of A Respiratory Syncytial Virus RSV Prefusion F Subunit Vaccine in Infants Born to Women Vaccinated During Pregnancy $9,150,259 64 payments
  3. Phase 1 Openlabel Dosefinding Study to Evaluate Safety Tolerability and Immunogenicity and Phase 23 Placebocontrolled Observerblinded Safety Tolerability and Immunogenicity Study of A Sarscov2 Rna Vaccine Candidate Against Covid19 in Healthy Children and Young Adults $5,549,376 77 payments
  4. A Phase 23 Randomized Doubleblind Doubledummy Placebo Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of 2 Regimens of Orally Administered PF 07321332Ritonavir in Preventing Symptomatic Sarscov2 Infection in Adult Household Contacts of An Individual With Symptomatic Covid19 $2,341,759 30 payments
  5. 1009742 $926,322 108 payments
  6. A Phase 3, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy of Sage-217 in the Treatment of Adult Subjects With Major Depressive Disorder $862,854 65 payments
  7. A Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled, Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Ly3819253 and Ly3832479 in Participants With Mild to Moderate Covid-19 Illness $833,420 4 payments
  8. A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multiple Rising Oral Dose Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Tak-994 in Patients With Narcolepsy With Or Without Cataplexy (Narcolepsy Type 1 Or Narcolepsy Type 2) $764,662 71 payments
  9. A Phase 23 Placebocontrolled Randomized Observerblind Study to Evaluate the Safety Tolerability and Immunogenicity of A Sarscov2 Rna Vaccine Candidate Bnt162b2 Against Covid19 in Healthy Pregnant Women 18 Years of Age and Older $737,478 48 payments
  10. Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of SAR440340/ REGN3500/ Itepekimab (Anti-IL-33 mAb) in Patients With Moderate-to-severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) $650,642 89 payments
What the money was spent on Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Other $59,186 15 payments

Only reported on some payments, and a payment can report more than one category, so these amounts overlap.

What you are looking at

A noncovered recipient is an organisation paid for research that is neither an individual clinician nor a teaching hospital — typically a contract research organisation, a foundation or a trial site network. They receive 81% of all reported research money, which is why they appear here at all.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record