Organisation paid for research Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Clinical Innovations Inc

Neither a doctor nor a teaching hospital

Research payments

$13,362,283

1,129 payments

Through program year 2025, Clinical Innovations Inc is reported as receiving $13,362,283 in research payments, across 1,129 payments.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $1,424,316 221
2024 Research $3,769,143 429
2023 Research $3,680,726 314
2022 Research $1,031,550 77
2021 Research $1,537,659 62
2020 Research $1,618,872 23
2019 Research $300,018 3

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc. $2,433,028 32 payments
  2. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. $2,185,097 174 payments
  3. Hoffmann-La Roche Limited $2,120,258 65 payments
  4. ITI, Inc. $2,083,509 427 payments
  5. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $1,546,946 9 payments
  6. AbbVie, Inc. $1,410,150 62 payments
  7. Moderna TX, Inc. $547,593 201 payments
  8. Imbrium Therapeutics L.P. $231,370 19 payments
  9. F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG $191,000 19 payments
  10. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $153,334 3 payments
Studies the money was for Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Acute Schizophrenia Study $2,259,758 66 payments
  2. A Multinational, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Placebo-Controlled Study with an Open-Label, Long-Term Safety Phase to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Olanzapine for Extended-Release Injectable Suspension (TV-44749) for Subcutaneous Use as Treatment of Adult Patients with Schizophrenia $2,115,144 155 payments
  3. An Open-label Study to Assess the Long-term Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of KarXT in De Novo Subjects With DSM-5 Schizophrenia $1,546,946 9 payments
  4. A Trial of Multiple-doses of Aripiprazole in Adults With Schizophrenia or Bipolar 1 Disorder $1,465,015 2 payments
  5. Iti-007-451 $1,168,461 371 payments
  6. A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Two Fixed Doses (15 mg and 30 mg QD) of?CVL-231?(Emraclidine) in Participants With Schizophrenia Experiencing an Acute Exacerbation of Psychosis $808,948 14 payments
  7. A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group Study of Lumateperone for the Prevention of Relapse in Patients with Schizophrenia $765,881 22 payments
  8. A Phase 3, randomized, observerblind, activecontrol study to evaluate the safety, reactogenicity, and immunogenicity of mRNA1083 (SARSCoV2 and influenza) vaccine in healthy adult participants, 50 years of age. $381,048 14 payments
  9. A Multicenter, Randomized, Flexible-Dose, Double Blind Trial of Brexpiprazole Versus Placebo for the Treatment of Adults With Borderline Personality Disorder $304,386 5 payments
  10. A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind Trial of Fixed-Dose Brexpiprazole As Combination Therapy With Sertraline in the Treatment of Adults With Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder $277,347 6 payments
What the money was spent on Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Patient care $68,107 8 payments

Only reported on some payments, and a payment can report more than one category, so these amounts overlap.

What you are looking at

A noncovered recipient is an organisation paid for research that is neither an individual clinician nor a teaching hospital — typically a contract research organisation, a foundation or a trial site network. They receive 81% of all reported research money, which is why they appear here at all.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record