Organisation paid for research Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Central Research Associates Inc

Neither a doctor nor a teaching hospital

Research payments

$6,040,030

687 payments

Through program year 2025, Central Research Associates Inc is reported as receiving $6,040,030 in research payments, across 687 payments.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $1,208,945 102
2024 Research $222,534 37
2023 Research $427,525 29
2022 Research $1,825,597 240
2021 Research $1,587,258 184
2020 Research $639,041 63
2019 Research $129,130 32

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $3,249,715 366 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $606,396 85 payments
  3. Pfizer Inc. $582,524 75 payments
  4. Allergan Inc. $401,257 47 payments
  5. Janssen Research & Development, LLC $337,859 23 payments
  6. Moderna TX, Inc. $320,215 27 payments
  7. AstraZeneca UK Limited $286,930 7 payments
  8. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $77,258 3 payments
  9. Sanofi US Services Inc. $60,911 18 payments
  10. Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. $47,600 11 payments
Studies the money was for Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Study name not reported $1,253,658 143 payments
  2. A Phase 3, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Observer-Blind, Multi-Count $1,040,144 107 payments
  3. A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Multi-Countr $835,186 97 payments
  4. A Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Oral Armour Thyroid Compared to Synthetic T4 for the Treatment of Primary Hypothyroidism in Adult Participants $435,279 49 payments
  5. A Study of mRNA-1010 Compared With a Licensed Influenza Vaccine in Adults ?50 Years of Age $313,505 25 payments
  6. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, dose-conversion study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of HRT w Armour Thyroid compared to levothyroxine (T4) in previously hypothyroid participants, who are on euthyroid T4 replacement $273,232 14 payments
  7. A Randomized Open Label Study Drug Dose Blind Multi Center Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of JNJ70033093 BMS986177 an Oral Factor XIa Inhibitor Versus Subcutaneous Enoxaparin in Subjects Undergoing Elective Total Knee Replacement Surgery $164,892 2 payments
  8. Phase 2b Multicentre, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel Group Dose-Ranging Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of AZD2373 in Participants with APOL1-Mediated Kidney Disease (APPRECIATE) $164,236 2 payments
  9. A Phase 3 Master Protocol to Evaluate the Safety Tolerability and Immunogenicity of Respiratory Syncytial Virus RSV Prefusion F Subunit Vaccine in Adults at High Risk of Severe RSV Disease $163,357 9 payments
  10. A Phase 3 Randomized Doubleblinded Placebocontrolled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of A Respiratory Syncytial Virus RSV Prefusion F Subunit Vaccine in Infants Born to Women Vaccinated During Pregnancy $150,546 9 payments
What the money was spent on Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Other $10,400 3 payments

Only reported on some payments, and a payment can report more than one category, so these amounts overlap.

What you are looking at

A noncovered recipient is an organisation paid for research that is neither an individual clinician nor a teaching hospital — typically a contract research organisation, a foundation or a trial site network. They receive 81% of all reported research money, which is why they appear here at all.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record