Organisation paid for research Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Care Access Research LLC

Neither a doctor nor a teaching hospital

Research payments

$90,513,450

2,979 payments

Through program year 2025, Care Access Research LLC is reported as receiving $90,513,450 in research payments, across 2,979 payments.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $21,955,148 767
2024 Research $15,418,760 610
2023 Research $18,322,593 452
2022 Research $19,337,591 328
2021 Research $7,140,640 229
2020 Research $6,527,354 285
2019 Research $1,811,364 308

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Eli Lilly and Company $73,516,805 794 payments
  2. Pfizer Inc. $6,572,621 44 payments
  3. Sanofi US Services Inc. $5,349,022 578 payments
  4. AbbVie, Inc. $2,203,015 556 payments
  5. Allergan Inc. $663,309 175 payments
  6. Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc. $335,795 13 payments
  7. Janssen Research & Development, LLC $306,048 71 payments
  8. Incyte Corporation $217,433 223 payments
  9. Ucb SA $160,793 16 payments
  10. Genentech, Inc. $139,658 31 payments
Studies the money was for Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. A Study of Donanemab Versus Placebo in Participants at Risk for Cognitive and Functional Decline of Alzheimer's Disease $14,534,748 81 payments
  2. A Donanemab (Ly3002813) Prevention Study in Participants With Alzheimer's Disease (Trailblazer-Alz 3) $10,604,423 33 payments
  3. A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Investigate the Effect of Lepodisiran on the Reduction of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Adults With Elevated Lipoprotein(A) Who Have Established Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Or Are at Risk for A First Cardiovascular Event - Acclaim-Lp(A) $6,829,416 49 payments
  4. A Phase 3 Multicenter Placebocontrolled Randomized Observerblinded Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy Safety Tolerability Immunogenicity and Lot Consistency of A 6Valent Ospabased Lyme Disease Vaccine in Healthy Participants 5 Years of Age $6,546,577 24 payments
  5. A Phase 3 Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Ly3819253 in Preventing Sars Cov 2 Infection and Covid 19 in Skilled Nursing and Assisted Living Facility Residents and Staff A Niaid and Lilly Collaborative Study $6,307,412 24 payments
  6. A Study of Remternetug Versus Placebo in Early Alzheimer's Disease Participants at Risk for Cognitive and Functional Decline $3,729,845 35 payments
  7. A Study of Donanemab Versus Placebo in Participants at Risk for Cognitive and Functional Decline of Alzheimer's Disease $3,417,897 34 payments
  8. Assessment of Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy Measured By Amyloid Reduction of Ly3372993 in Early Symptomatic Alzheimer's Disease $3,029,481 5 payments
  9. Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of SAR440340/ REGN3500/ Itepekimab (Anti-IL-33 mAb) in Patients With Moderate-to-severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) $2,903,192 323 payments
  10. A Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled, Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Ly3819253 and Ly3832479 in Participants With Mild to Moderate Covid-19 Illness $2,715,190 11 payments
What the money was spent on Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Patient care $19,615 3 payments

Only reported on some payments, and a payment can report more than one category, so these amounts overlap.

What you are looking at

A noncovered recipient is an organisation paid for research that is neither an individual clinician nor a teaching hospital — typically a contract research organisation, a foundation or a trial site network. They receive 81% of all reported research money, which is why they appear here at all.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record