Organisation paid for research Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Care Access Research

Neither a doctor nor a teaching hospital

Research payments

$4,644,745

479 payments

Through program year 2025, Care Access Research is reported as receiving $4,644,745 in research payments, across 479 payments.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $1,362,430 102
2024 Research $1,709,331 69
2023 Research $1,064,590 48
2022 Research $261,694 40
2021 Research $189,690 197
2020 Research $45,199 13
2019 Research $11,810 10

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,877,527 76 payments
  2. Celgene Corporation $1,301,172 28 payments
  3. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $672,123 34 payments
  4. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $397,131 73 payments
  5. AstraZeneca UK Limited $94,016 3 payments
  6. AbbVie, Inc. $84,881 40 payments
  7. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $84,488 8 payments
  8. Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc $39,226 30 payments
  9. Novo Nordisk AS $27,646 163 payments
  10. Ucb SA $18,754 9 payments
Studies the money was for Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. A Randomized DoubleBlind Parallel Group Multi Center Phase III Study to Assess the Efficacy of Budesonide Glycopyrronium and Formoterol Fumarate MeterednDose Inhaler Relative to Glycopyrronium and Formoterol Fumarate MDI on Cardiopulmonary Outcomes in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease THARROS $854,739 20 payments
  2. Phase III CC-93538 Treat-Through (CC-93538-EE-001) Wk24 PE Primary - A Multi-Center, Multi-National, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Induction and Long-term Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of CC-93538 in Adult and Adolesc $615,480 11 payments
  3. A Randomized Double-Blind Parallel Group Multicenter 12 Week Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Budesonide and Formoterol Fumarate Metered Dose Inhaler Relative to Budesonide Metered Dose Inhaler in Participants with Inadequately Controlled Asthma $328,784 13 payments
  4. A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Effect of Inclisiran on Preventing Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in High-risk Primary Prevention Patients (VICTORION-1 PREVENT) $301,286 6 payments
  5. Phase III Study - Long Term Extension/Rollover from EE-001 - A Phase 3, Multi-Center, Multi-National, Open-Label Extension Study to Evaluate the Long Term Efficacy and Safety of CC-93538 in Adult and Adolescent Subjects with Active Eosinophilic Esophagiti $256,923 6 payments
  6. A Multicentre, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Dose Find $149,133 18 payments
  7. A Multi-Center, Multi-National, Randomized, Double - A Multi-Center, Multi-National, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Induction and Long-term Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of CC-93538 in Adult and Adolescent Subjects wit $137,015 2 payments
  8. A Phase 2b3 Randomized, Double blind, Placebo controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Cotadutide in Participants with Non cirrhotic Non alcoholic Steatohepatitis with Fibrosis $133,734 6 payments
  9. A Phase III, Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group Study to Assess the Effect of AZD0780 on Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Established Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (ASCVD) or at High Risk for a First ASCVD Event $120,103 6 payments
  10. A Phase 3, Multi-Center, Multi-National, Open-Label Extension Study to Evaluate the Long Term Efficacy and Safety of CC-93538 in Adult and Adolescent Subjects with Active Eosinophilic Esophagitis. $116,446 5 payments
What the money was spent on Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Other $11,810 10 payments

Only reported on some payments, and a payment can report more than one category, so these amounts overlap.

What you are looking at

A noncovered recipient is an organisation paid for research that is neither an individual clinician nor a teaching hospital — typically a contract research organisation, a foundation or a trial site network. They receive 81% of all reported research money, which is why they appear here at all.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record