Organisation paid for research Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University

Neither a doctor nor a teaching hospital

Research payments

$51,789,417

4,530 payments

Through program year 2025, Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University is reported as receiving $51,789,417 in research payments, across 4,530 payments.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $7,112,604 974
2024 Research $10,079,703 1,093
2023 Research $7,387,347 610
2022 Research $4,206,578 373
2021 Research $6,602,870 428
2020 Research $9,571,611 626
2019 Research $6,828,705 426

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Biogen, Inc. $9,299,516 66 payments
  2. Blueprint Medicines Corporation $5,696,561 518 payments
  3. Genentech, Inc. $4,355,957 224 payments
  4. Hoffmann-La Roche Limited $2,639,519 176 payments
  5. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $2,590,576 367 payments
  6. Genmab A/S $2,264,099 564 payments
  7. Innate Pharma, Inc $1,718,779 74 payments
  8. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $1,527,797 38 payments
  9. F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG $1,509,448 74 payments
  10. Genzyme Corporation $1,449,815 83 payments
Studies the money was for Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. A Phase 1b/2, Open-Label, Safety and Efficacy Study of Epcoritamab (GEN3013; DuoBody-CD3 X CD20) in Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. $2,238,089 557 payments
  2. A 3-Part, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase 2 Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Avapritinib (BLU-285), a Selective KIT Mutation-Targeted Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor, in Indolent and Smoldering Systemic Mastocytosis With Symptoms Inadequately Controlled With Standard Therapy $2,232,946 153 payments
  3. An Open-label, Single Arm, Phase 2 Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Avapritinib (BLU-285), A Selective KIT Mutation-targeted Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor, in Patients With Advanced Systemic Mastocytosis $1,802,679 169 payments
  4. A Phase 1 Multiple-Ascending-Dose Study to Assess the Safety,Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of BIIB105 Administered Intrathecally to AdultsWith Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis With or Without Poly-CAG Expansion in theAtaxin-2 Gene $1,501,274 3 payments
  5. Study of IPH2201 (Monalizumab) and Cetuximab in Patients With Recurrent or Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck $1,383,992 53 payments
  6. Phase I, Open-Label, Dose Comparison Study of Avxs-101 for Sitting But Non-Ambulatory Patients With Spinal Muscular Atrophy $1,183,849 30 payments
  7. Morpheus Breast Cancer $1,040,746 92 payments
  8. A Long-Term Extension Study of Nusinersen (BIIB058) Administered at Higher Doses in Participants With Spinal Muscular Atrophy Who Previously Participated in an Investigational Study with Nusinersen. $812,775 4 payments
  9. A Study for Participants With Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) Who Previously Participated in Nusinersen (ISIS 396443) Investigational Studies. $811,459 3 payments
  10. Morpheus Breast $794,602 41 payments
What the money was spent on Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Patient care $694,460 52 payments
  2. Other $231,934 27 payments
  3. Overhead $67,534 18 payments
  4. Non-patient care $4,704 12 payments
  5. Medical research writing or publication $990 3 payments

Only reported on some payments, and a payment can report more than one category, so these amounts overlap.

What you are looking at

A noncovered recipient is an organisation paid for research that is neither an individual clinician nor a teaching hospital — typically a contract research organisation, a foundation or a trial site network. They receive 81% of all reported research money, which is why they appear here at all.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record