Organisation paid for research Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Bernstein Clinical Research Center

Neither a doctor nor a teaching hospital

Research payments

$922,741

263 payments

Through program year 2025, Bernstein Clinical Research Center is reported as receiving $922,741 in research payments, across 263 payments.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $133,621 54
2024 Research $93,822 60
2023 Research $98,357 27
2022 Research $149,221 63
2021 Research $162,238 40
2020 Research $85,654 6
2019 Research $199,828 13

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. CSL Behring $477,978 215 payments
  2. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $272,030 22 payments
  3. Cipla USA Inc. $111,405 7 payments
  4. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $58,137 17 payments
  5. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $3,190 2 payments
Studies the money was for Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. A Multicenter, Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-arm Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Administration of CSL312 (Garadacimab) in the Prophylactic Treatment of Hereditary Angioedema $175,824 47 payments
  2. An Open-label Study to Evaluate the Long-term Safety and Efficacy of CSL312 (Garadacimab) in the Prophylactic Treatment of Hereditary Angioedema $167,436 93 payments
  3. U-Fs-Mu-As3120 $111,405 7 payments
  4. A Multi Center Randomized Double Blind Active and Placebo Controlled Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Ligelizumab Qge031 in the Treatment of Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria Csu in Adolescents and Adults Inadequately Controlled With H1 Antihis $83,228 2 payments
  5. A Phase 3 Open-label Study to Evaluate the Safety, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Efficacy of CSL312 (Garadacimab) in the Prophylactic Treatment of Hereditary Angioedema in Pediatric Subjects 2 to 11 Years of Age $77,614 46 payments
  6. A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study in Cat-Allergic Patients With Allergic Rhinitis Who Live With a Cat to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Anti-Fel d 1 Antibodies During Natural Cat Exposure in the Home $52,137 15 payments
  7. A US Phase 3b, Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Double-Dummy Study to Evaluate Efficacy of Remibrutinib Compared to Dupilumab at Early Timepoints in Adults With Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria Inadequately Controlled by Second Generation H1-Antihista $50,133 1 payment
  8. A Randomized Double Blind Placebo Controlled Parallel Group Dose Ranging Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of Oral Zpl389a 3 MG 10 MG 30 MG and 50 MG Capsules Administered for 16 Weeks in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis $50,039 4 payments
  9. A Phase 4 Open-label Study to Evaluate the Safety After Switching to CSL312 (Garadacimab) From Current Prophylactic HAE Treatment in Subjects With HAE 12 Years of Age $40,239 20 payments
  10. A Multi-Center, Double-Blinded and Open-Label Extension Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Ligelizumab As Retreatment, Self-Administered Therapy and Monotherapy in Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria Patients Who Completed Studies Cqge031c2302, Cqge03 $24,216 2 payments

What you are looking at

A noncovered recipient is an organisation paid for research that is neither an individual clinician nor a teaching hospital — typically a contract research organisation, a foundation or a trial site network. They receive 81% of all reported research money, which is why they appear here at all.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record