Organisation paid for research Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Ark Clinical Research, LLC

Neither a doctor nor a teaching hospital

Research payments

$268,230

49 payments

Through program year 2025, Ark Clinical Research, LLC is reported as receiving $268,230 in research payments, across 49 payments.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $6,522 9
2024 Research $110,402 18
2023 Research $50,473 13
2020 Research $2,808 1
2019 Research $98,025 8

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. $175,748 39 payments
  2. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $43,175 2 payments
  3. AstraZeneca AB $38,699 1 payment
  4. Taro Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. $10,522 5 payments
  5. Moderna TX, Inc. $86 2 payments
Studies the money was for Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. An Open Label, Single Dose, 3-Period, Crossover Study to Determine the Pharmacokinetic Profile and Safety of Fluticasone Propionate/Albuterol Sulfate (Fp/ABS) Multidose Dry Powder Inhaler with e-Module (eMDPI) Compared to Fluticasone Propionate Multidose Dry Powder Inhaler (Fp MDPI) in Participants with Asthma (4 to 11 Years Old) $91,986 10 payments
  2. Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, Tolerability, and Immunogenicity of TEV-45779 Compared to XOLAIR (Omalizumab) in Patients With Chronic Idiopathic/Spontaneous Urticaria Who Remain Symptomatic Despite Antihistamine (H1) Treatment $73,639 17 payments
  3. A Randomized Double-Blind Parallel Group Multi-Center 24-Week Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Three Doses of PT001 to Placebo and Open-label Spiriva Respimat in Subjects With Persistent Asthma $43,175 2 payments
  4. A Study of the Safety and Effectiveness of Benralizumab to Treat Patients With Severe Uncontrolled Asthma. $38,699 1 payment
  5. A 12-Week, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Efficacy and Safety Study of Fluticasone Propionate Multidose Dry Powder Inhaler Compared With Fluticasone Propionate/Salmeterol Multidose Dry Powder Inhaler in Patients Aged 4 Through 11 Years With Persistent Asthma $8,437 1 payment
  6. A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Bioequivalence of Mupirocin Calcium Cream, 2 and Bactroban Cream and Compare Both to a Vehicle in Treatment of Secondarily Infected Traumatic Skin Lesions $4,312 2 payments
  7. Bio-equivalence Study With Clinical Endpoints in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris $3,402 2 payments
  8. A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multiple Center Placebo Controlled Study Comparing Taro Product to RLD and Both Treatments to a Placebo Control in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris $2,808 1 payment
  9. A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial on Efficacy and Safety of Fluticasone Propionate/Albuterol Sulfate Combination in Participants 12 Years and Older With Asthma $935 6 payments
  10. A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter, Active-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Fluticasone Propionate/Albuterol Sulfate Fixed-Dose Combination on Severe Asthma Exacerbations in Patients With Asthma $750 5 payments
What the money was spent on Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Professional salary support $7,272 4 payments
  2. Overhead $3,250 1 payment

Only reported on some payments, and a payment can report more than one category, so these amounts overlap.

What you are looking at

A noncovered recipient is an organisation paid for research that is neither an individual clinician nor a teaching hospital — typically a contract research organisation, a foundation or a trial site network. They receive 81% of all reported research money, which is why they appear here at all.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record