Organisation paid for research Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Apex Clinical Research

Neither a doctor nor a teaching hospital

Research payments

$1,669,659

225 payments

Through program year 2025, Apex Clinical Research is reported as receiving $1,669,659 in research payments, across 225 payments.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $963,982 173
2024 Research $167,256 10
2023 Research $409,643 13
2022 Research $114,418 25
2021 Research $12,300 1
2020 Research $1 1
2019 Research $2,060 2

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $606,080 12 payments
  2. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $544,795 9 payments
  3. Seqirus USA Inc $353,058 161 payments
  4. AbbVie, Inc. $163,665 40 payments
  5. Shionogi Inc $2,060 2 payments
  6. Eli Lilly and Company $1 1 payment
Studies the money was for Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. A Phase 3/3b Randomized Observer-blind Multicenter Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy Safety and Immunogenicity of an MF59-Adjuvanted Quadrivalent Subunit Inactivated Influenza Vaccine Compared to a Non-Influenza Vaccine in Adults >=50 Years of Age $344,497 157 payments
  2. A MULTICENTER, RANDOMIZED, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED STUDY EVALUTING IMPACT OF DEUCRAVACITINIB ON QoL, EFFICACY AND SAFETY IN PATIENTS WITH PLAQUE PSORIASIS AND IMPAIRED HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE $291,730 2 payments
  3. A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Maridebart Cafraglutide in Adult Participants Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Who Have Obesity or Are Overweight $191,101 1 payment
  4. A Phase 3, Multicenter, Double-blind Maintenance Study to Assess Long-term Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Rocatinlimab in Adult and Adolescent Subjects With Moderate-to-severe Atopic Dermatitis (AD) (ROCKET-ASCEND) $190,551 1 payment
  5. A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study Evaluating the Effect of Deucravacitinib on Quality of Life in Participants With Plaque Psoriasis in a Community Setting $176,159 4 payments
  6. A Study of Subcutaneous Risankizumab Injection for Pediatric Participants With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis to Assess Change in Disease Symptoms $120,151 33 payments
  7. A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label, Performance Study With Self-administered Subcutaneous Rocatinlimab (AMG 451) in Adolescent and Adult Subjects With Moderate-to-severe Atopic Dermatitis (AD) (ROCKET-Outpost) $115,374 1 payment
  8. A Phase 3, Randomized, 52-week, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind Study With Re-randomization to Assess the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Rocatinlimab (AMG 451) in Adolescent Subjects With Moderate-to-severe Atopic Dermatitis (AD) (ROCKET-ASTRO) $47,695 2 payments
  9. A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study Evaluating the Effect of Deucravacitinib on Quality of Life in Participants With Plaque Psoriasis in A Community Setting (Artistyk) $39,100 1 payment
  10. A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of Deucravacitinib in Adolescent Participants (12 years to less than 18 years) with Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis $37,500 1 payment

What you are looking at

A noncovered recipient is an organisation paid for research that is neither an individual clinician nor a teaching hospital — typically a contract research organisation, a foundation or a trial site network. They receive 81% of all reported research money, which is why they appear here at all.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record