Organisation paid for research Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Alpha Oncology Research

Neither a doctor nor a teaching hospital

Research payments

$277,535

17 payments

Through program year 2025, Alpha Oncology Research is reported as receiving $277,535 in research payments, across 17 payments.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $87,536 4
2024 Research $42,931 3
2023 Research $98,992 6
2022 Research $38,316 2
2020 Research $9,761 2

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2020–2025
  1. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $230,626 10 payments
  2. MorphoSys AG $37,149 5 payments
  3. United Therapeutics Corporation $9,761 2 payments
Studies the money was for Research payments · program years 2020–2025
  1. A Phase II Multicenter Study to Confirm PK PD of Crizanlizumab With Or Without Hydroxyurea Hydroxycarbamide in Adult Sickle Cell Disease Patients With History of Voc $98,457 2 payments
  2. A Randomized, Controlled, Open Label, Phase III Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of JDQ443 Versus Docetaxel in Previously Treated Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic KRAS G12C Mutant Non-small Cell Lung Cancer $42,925 2 payments
  3. KontRASt-08: A randomized, multicenter phase II/III study evaluating the efficacy and safety of opnurasib (JDQ443) combined with pembrolizumab versus pembrolizumab as first-line therapy for adult participants with locally advanced or metastatic non-squamo $42,120 1 payment
  4. A randomized, multicenter phase II/III study evaluating the efficacy and safety of opnurasib (JDQ443) combined with pembrolizumab plus platinum and pemetrexed versus pembrolizumab plus platinum and pemetrexed as first-line therapy for adult participants w $28,020 1 payment
  5. A phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial comparing the efficacy and safety of tafasitamab plus lenalidomide in addition to R-CHOP versus R-CHOP in previously untreated, high-intermediate and high-risk patients with newly-diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) - Front Mind $20,538 1 payment
  6. A phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial comparing the efficacy and safety of tafasitamab plus lenalidomide in addition to R-CHOP versus R-CHOP in previously untreated, high-intermediate and high-risk patients with newly-diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) $16,611 4 payments
  7. A randomized, multicenter phase II/III study evaluating the efficacy and safety of opnurasib (JDQ443) combined with pembrolizumab plus platinum and pemetrexed versus pembrolizumab plus platinum and pemetrexed as first-line therapy for adult participants with locally advanced or metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring KRAS G12C mutation and PD-L1 expression <50% $14,939 1 payment
  8. A Two-Part Open-Label Randomized Phase II/III Study of Dinutuximab and Irinotecan Versus Irinotecan for Second-Line Treatment of Subjects With Relapsed Or Refractory Small Cell Lung Cancer $9,761 2 payments
  9. A Post-Trial Access Roll-Over Study to Allow Access to Ribociclib (Lee011) for Patients Who Are on Ribociclib Treatment in Novartis-Sponsored Study $4,165 3 payments

What you are looking at

A noncovered recipient is an organisation paid for research that is neither an individual clinician nor a teaching hospital — typically a contract research organisation, a foundation or a trial site network. They receive 81% of all reported research money, which is why they appear here at all.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record