Organisation paid for research Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Allianz Research Institute Inc

Neither a doctor nor a teaching hospital

Research payments

$1,295,254

212 payments

Through program year 2025, Allianz Research Institute Inc is reported as receiving $1,295,254 in research payments, across 212 payments.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $152,041 51
2024 Research $112,973 51
2023 Research $198,958 52
2022 Research $103,944 23
2021 Research $392,296 6
2020 Research $28,101 2
2019 Research $306,939 27

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Eli Lilly and Company $379,446 4 payments
  2. Sanofi US Services Inc. $339,909 54 payments
  3. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $171,891 6 payments
  4. Chiesi USA, Inc. $167,434 42 payments
  5. Genzyme Corporation $139,260 42 payments
  6. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC $43,567 4 payments
  7. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $42,135 55 payments
  8. Novo Nordisk AS $11,612 5 payments
Studies the money was for Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. A Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled, Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Ly3819253 and Ly3832479 in Participants With Mild to Moderate Covid-19 Illness $357,656 2 payments
  2. A Phase IV, 12 Week, Randomised, Double Blind Study to Compare Single $161,441 5 payments
  3. A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled Study Assessing the Long-term Effect of Dupilumab on Prevention of Lung Function Decline in Patients With Uncontrolled Moderate to Severe Asthma $128,160 41 payments
  4. A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, 52-week Pivotal Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Dupilumab in Patients With Moderate-to-severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) With Type 2 Inflammation $81,211 19 payments
  5. A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Dose Ranging Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Subcutaneous Amlitelimab in Adult Participants With Moderate-to-severe Asthma $72,778 8 payments
  6. A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Proof-of-Concept (PoC) Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of SAR440340, in Patients With Moderate-to-severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) $66,720 8 payments
  7. A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Proof-of-Concept (PoC) Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Itepekimab, in Participants With Non-cystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis $54,700 11 payments
  8. A Study Comparing Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of the Fixed Dose Triple Combination CHF 5993 With the Fixed Dose Dual Combination CHF 1535 in Subjects With COPD (Triton) $53,634 13 payments
  9. A Study Comparing Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of the Fixed Dose Triple Combination CHF 5993 With the Fixed Dose Dual Combination CHF 1535 in Subjects With COPD (TRITON) $43,768 10 payments
  10. A 26-week Randomized, Open-label, Active-controlled, 2-treatment Arm, Parallel Group Multi-center Study, Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Soliqua 100/33 Versus Lantus in Ethnically/Racially Divers $41,780 3 payments

What you are looking at

A noncovered recipient is an organisation paid for research that is neither an individual clinician nor a teaching hospital — typically a contract research organisation, a foundation or a trial site network. They receive 81% of all reported research money, which is why they appear here at all.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record