Organisation paid for research Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Aga Clinical Trials

Neither a doctor nor a teaching hospital

Research payments

$1,800,142

295 payments

Through program year 2025, Aga Clinical Trials is reported as receiving $1,800,142 in research payments, across 295 payments.

By program year

6 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $1,537,623 180
2024 Research $55,080 103
2023 Research $632 5
2022 Research $1,581 2
2021 Research $39,119 3
2020 Research $166,107 2

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2020–2025
  1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,378,685 38 payments
  2. Ipsen Innovation $210,737 236 payments
  3. H. Lundbeck A S $166,107 2 payments
  4. Eli Lilly and Company $40,348 4 payments
  5. AbbVie, Inc. $2,133 4 payments
  6. Moderna TX, Inc. $1,812 5 payments
  7. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $291 3 payments
  8. Novo Nordisk AS $29 3 payments
Studies the money was for Research payments · program years 2020–2025
  1. A Phase II Randomised Double blind Placebo controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy Safety and Tolerability of AZD6234 in Participants Living with Obesity or Overweight with Comorbidity $1,062,248 1 payment
  2. Evaluate Efficacy & Safety of Eptinezumab Administered Intravenously in Subjects Experiencing Acute Attack of Migraine (RELIEF) $166,107 2 payments
  3. Phase III, Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter, Parallel-group Study with Extension Phase to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Dysport for the Prevention of Chronic Migraine in Adult Participants $122,798 125 payments
  4. A Phase III, Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter, Parallel-group Study With Extension Phase to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Dysport for the Prevention of Episodic Migraine in Adult Participants $87,939 111 payments
  5. A Phase II, Randomized, Double-blind, Single-dose, Placebo-controlled, 3-Period, 3-Treatment, Crossover, Multicenter Study to Compare the Bronchodilatory Effect and Safety of PT007 AS MDI to Placebo MDI and Open-Label Ventolin Evohaler in Adult Participants with Asthma MITCHELL $58,308 1 payment
  6. A Randomized DoubleBlind Parallel Group Multi Center Phase III Study to Assess the Efficacy of Budesonide Glycopyrronium and Formoterol Fumarate MeterednDose Inhaler Relative to Glycopyrronium and Formoterol Fumarate MDI on Cardiopulmonary Outcomes in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease THARROS $53,811 8 payments
  7. a phase 3,randomised,double blind,active controlled study to assess the efficacy,safety and tolerability of baxdrostat in combination with dapagliflozin compared with dapagliflozin alone on chronic kidney disease ckd progression in participants with ckd and high blood pressure $46,201 8 payments
  8. Assessment of Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Donanemab in Early Symptomatic Alzheimers Disease $40,293 3 payments
  9. A Phase IIb Randomized Double blind Placebo controlled and Open label Active Comparator Study to Evaluate the Efficacy Safety and Tolerability of AZD5004 in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus $21,964 1 payment
  10. A Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Placebo-Controlled Phase III Efficacy and Safety Study of Tezepelumab in Patients with Eosinophilic Esophagitis (CROSSING) $20,533 1 payment

What you are looking at

A noncovered recipient is an organisation paid for research that is neither an individual clinician nor a teaching hospital — typically a contract research organisation, a foundation or a trial site network. They receive 81% of all reported research money, which is why they appear here at all.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record