Organisation paid for research Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Advent Health

Neither a doctor nor a teaching hospital

Research payments

$556,324

118 payments

Through program year 2025, Advent Health is reported as receiving $556,324 in research payments, across 118 payments.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $32,500 1
2022 Research $4,898 6
2021 Research $135,007 9
2020 Research $219,297 24
2019 Research $164,623 78

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $502,403 95 payments
  2. Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc. $32,500 1 payment
  3. Eli Lilly and Company $20,998 18 payments
  4. Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $424 4 payments
Studies the money was for Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. A Phase 3 Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blinded, Active-controlled, Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Lenvatinib E7080,MK-7902 in Combination with Pembrolizumab MK-3475 Versus Lenvatinib in First-line Therapy of Participants with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma LEAP-002 $296,488 24 payments
  2. A Phase 3 Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blinded, Active-controlled, Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Lenvatinib E7080,MK-7902 in Combination with Pembrolizumab MK-3475 Versus Lenvatinib in First-line Therapy of Participants with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma LEAP-002 $105,532 2 payments
  3. A Phase 3, Randomized Double Blind Study to Evaluate Peri-operative Pembrolizumab MK-3475 Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy versus Perioperative Placebo Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Cisplatin-Eligible Participants with Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer KEYNOTE-866 $67,250 3 payments
  4. A Phase 3, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Multicenter Trial of Selinexor in Maintenance Therapy After Systemic Therapy for Patients With p53 Wild-Type, Advanced or Recurrent Endometrial Carcinoma $32,500 1 payment
  5. A Randomized, Phase 3, Open-label Study to Investigate the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Subcutaneous Pembrolizumab versus Intravenous Pembrolizumab, Administered with Platinum Doublet Chemotherapy, in the First-Line Treatment of Participants with Metastatic Squamous or Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer $21,892 1 payment
  6. Assessment of Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Donanemab in Early Symptomatic Alzheimers Disease $7,164 3 payments
  7. Assessment of Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Ly3303560 in Early Symptomatic Alzheimer's Disease $6,849 3 payments
  8. A Phase 3 Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blinded, Active-controlled, Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Lenvatinib E7080,MK-7902 in Combination with Pembrolizumab MK-3475 Versus Lenvatinib in First-line Therapy of Participants with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma LEAP-002 $5,857 6 payments
  9. A Randomized, Phase III Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of MK-3475 as Adjuvant Therapy for Triple Receptor-Negative Breast Cancer with 1 cm Residual Invasive Cancer or Positive Lymph Nodes pN1mic After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy $2,780 1 payment
  10. Donanemab Follow-On Study: Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy in Symptomatic Alzheimer's Disease With Validation of Remote Neuropsychological Assessments $2,441 2 payments

What you are looking at

A noncovered recipient is an organisation paid for research that is neither an individual clinician nor a teaching hospital — typically a contract research organisation, a foundation or a trial site network. They receive 81% of all reported research money, which is why they appear here at all.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record