Organisation paid for research Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Advanced Urology PLLC

Neither a doctor nor a teaching hospital

Research payments

$4,637,216

510 payments

Through program year 2025, Advanced Urology PLLC is reported as receiving $4,637,216 in research payments, across 510 payments.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $1,850,881 201
2024 Research $1,039,003 75
2023 Research $487,021 49
2022 Research $247,788 47
2021 Research $480,356 74
2020 Research $498,709 57
2019 Research $33,459 7

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Janssen Research & Development, LLC $4,487,003 492 payments
  2. Dendreon Pharmaceuticals LLC $91,031 10 payments
  3. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $44,652 1 payment
  4. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $12,000 1 payment
  5. AbbVie, Inc. $2,530 6 payments
Studies the money was for Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. A Randomized Double blind Placebo controlled Phase 3 Study of Apalutamide in Subjects with High risk Localized or Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer Who are Candidates for Radical Prostatectomy $1,651,283 191 payments
  2. A Phase 3, Open-label, Randomized, Prospective Study of Apalutamide Monotherapy Versus Apalutamide Plus Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) in Participants Newly Diagnosed with Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer (mCSPC) $939,602 46 payments
  3. A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Phase 3 Study of Apalutamide in Subjects with High-risk, Localized or Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer Who are Candidates for Radical Prostatectomy $462,077 42 payments
  4. A Phase 3, Open-Label, Multi-Center, Randomized Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of TAR-200 in Combination with Cetrelimab Versus Intravesical Bacillus CalmetteGurin (BCG) in Participants with BCG-nave High-Risk Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Canc $372,244 27 payments
  5. A Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter, Open-label Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Adding Apalutamide to Radiotherapy and LHRH Agonist in High-Risk Patients with PSMA-PET-Positive Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer, with an Observational Fo $345,150 30 payments
  6. MoonRISe-1 - A Phase 3, Randomized Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of TAR-210 Erdafitinib Intravesical Delivery System Versus Single Agent Intravesical Chemotherapy in Participants With Intermediate-risk Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (IR-NM $120,796 24 payments
  7. A Phase 3, Randomized, Open-label, Multi-center Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of TAR-200 Versus Investigator's Choice of Intravesical Chemotherapy in Participants Who Received Bacillus Calmette-Gurin (BCG) and Recurred with High-risk Non-musc $96,611 10 payments
  8. ProvONE Study $68,905 8 payments
  9. A Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter, Open-label Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Adding Apalutamide to Radiotherapy and LHRH Agonist in High-Risk Patients with PSMA-PET-Positive Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer, with an Observational Follow-up of PSMA-PET-Negative Patients $63,572 8 payments
  10. A Phase 3, Open-Label, Multi-Center, Randomized Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of TAR-200 in Combination with Cetrelimab Versus Intravesical Bacillus CalmetteGurin (BCG) in Participants with BCG-nave High-Risk Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (HR-NMIBC) $54,649 8 payments

What you are looking at

A noncovered recipient is an organisation paid for research that is neither an individual clinician nor a teaching hospital — typically a contract research organisation, a foundation or a trial site network. They receive 81% of all reported research money, which is why they appear here at all.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record