Organisation paid for research Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Advanced Research

Neither a doctor nor a teaching hospital

Research payments

$668,128

278 payments

Through program year 2025, Advanced Research is reported as receiving $668,128 in research payments, across 278 payments.

By program year

4 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $615,269 267
2024 Research $40,834 6
2023 Research $10,025 4
2021 Research $2,000 1

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $606,565 265 payments
  2. Argenx US, Inc. $37,324 4 payments
  3. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $15,343 5 payments
  4. EyePoint Pharmaceuticals US, Inc. $6,250 1 payment
  5. Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $2,000 1 payment
  6. Celgene Corporation $646 2 payments
Studies the money was for Research payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. A Phase 3b Single-Arm Study of Aflibercept 8 mg in Participants With Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (nAMD) or Diabetic Macular Edema (DME) $600,166 263 payments
  2. A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-masked, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, Tolerability, Durability, Pharmacodynamics, Pharmacokinetics, and Immunogenicity of Efgartigimod PH20 SC administered by prefilled syringe (PFS) in Adult Participants with active Thyroid Eye Disease $37,324 4 payments
  3. A PHASE 3, TWO-STAGE, RANDOMIZED, MULTICENTER, OPEN-LABEL STUDY COMPARING MEZIGDOMIDE (CC-92480), BORTEZOMIB AND DEXAMETHASONE (MEZIVd) VERSUS POMALIDOMIDE, BORTEZOMIB AND DEXAMETHASONE (PVd) IN SUBJECTS WITH RELAPSED OR REFRACTORY MULTIPLE MYELOMA (RRMM): SUCCESSOR-1 $7,016 1 payment
  4. A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Masked, Placebo-Controlled Phase 3 Study of the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Subcutaneously Administered Pozelimab in Combination With Cemdisiran or Cemdisiran Alone in Participants With Geographic Atrophy Secondary to Age-Related Macular Degeneration $6,399 2 payments
  5. Fluocinolone Acetonide Intravitreal Implant 0.18 mg in the Treatment of Chronic Non-Infectious Posterior Segment Uveitis $6,250 1 payment
  6. Phase III RRMM: 480Vd vs PVd (SUCCESSOR 1) - A PHASE 3, TWO-STAGE, RANDOMIZED, MULTICENTER, OPEN-LABEL STUDY COMPARING MEZIGDOMIDE (CC-92480), BORTEZOMIB AND DEXAMETHASONE (MEZIVd) VERSUS POMALIDOMIDE, BORTEZOMIB AND DEXAMETHASONE (PVd) IN SUBJECTS WITH R $5,587 2 payments
  7. A Phase 2, Double-Masked, Placebo-Controlled, Dose Range Finding Study of Danicopan (ALXN2040) in Patients With Geographic Atrophy (GA) Secondary to Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD) $2,000 1 payment
  8. Ph II/III RR LR MDS mono vs Placebo - A Phase 2/3, Multicenter, Randomized, Dose Optimization (Part I), Double-blind (Part II) Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Oral Azacitidine (Oral-Aza, ONUREG ) plus Best Supportive Care (BSC) versus Placebo $1,698 3 payments
  9. A Phase 3, Open-label, Randomized Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Luspatercept vs Epoetin Alfa for the Treatment of Anemia Due to Revised International Prognostic Scoring System Very Low, Low, or Intermediate Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome in Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent naive Participants who are Non-Transfusion Dependent $1,687 1 payment

What you are looking at

A noncovered recipient is an organisation paid for research that is neither an individual clinician nor a teaching hospital — typically a contract research organisation, a foundation or a trial site network. They receive 81% of all reported research money, which is why they appear here at all.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record