Organisation paid for research Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Accurate Clinical Research

Neither a doctor nor a teaching hospital

Research payments

$3,300,367

215 payments

Through program year 2025, Accurate Clinical Research is reported as receiving $3,300,367 in research payments, across 215 payments.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $1,226,721 30
2024 Research $931,941 15
2023 Research $548,307 17
2022 Research $195,051 23
2021 Research $105,641 95
2020 Research $94,444 21
2019 Research $198,261 14

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $1,782,790 28 payments
  2. AstraZeneca UK Limited $707,687 21 payments
  3. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $425,953 18 payments
  4. Ucb SA $225,106 15 payments
  5. Biogen, Inc. $53,660 1 payment
  6. Amgen Inc. $46,988 4 payments
  7. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $26,920 5 payments
  8. Mallinckrodt Enterprises LLC $16,978 3 payments
  9. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $8,952 110 payments
  10. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $4,031 2 payments
Studies the money was for Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. An Open-Label, Multi-Center Protocol for Patients Who Have Completed A Previous Novartis Sponsored Secukinumab Study and Are Judged By the Investigator to Benefit From Continued Secukinumab Treatment $626,497 3 payments
  2. A Phase I-III Randomized Double blind Study to Evaluate the Safety and Neutralizing Activity of AZD5156-AZD3152 for Pre exposure Prophylaxis of COVID 19 in Participants with Conditions Causing Immune Impairment $416,966 6 payments
  3. A Multi-center, Open-label Extension Study of Subcutaneous Secukinumab to Evaluate the Long-term Safety and Tolerability in Polymyalgia Rheumatica (PMR) $397,966 3 payments
  4. A Randomized, Parallel-group, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Phase III Trial to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Secukinumab Administered Subcutaneously Versus Placebo, in Combination With a Glucocorticoid Taper Regimen, in Patients With Polymyalgia Rheumatica (PMR) $336,862 4 payments
  5. The purpose of this study is to characterise longterm safety and tolerability of intravenous anifrolumab A Multicentre Randomised Double blind Placebo Controlled Phase 3 Extension Study to Characterise the Long term Safety and Tolerability of Anifrolumab in Adult Subjects With Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus $252,738 14 payments
  6. a phase 3,randomised,double blind,active controlled study to assess the efficacy,safety and tolerability of baxdrostat in combination with dapagliflozin compared with dapagliflozin alone on chronic kidney disease ckd progression in participants with ckd and high blood pressure $179,337 2 payments
  7. A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Multicenter Phase 3 Study to Evaluate Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Ianalumab on Top of Standard-of-care Therapy in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SIRIUS-SLE 2) $168,736 5 payments
  8. A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Dapirolizumab Pegol in Study Participants With Moderately to Severely Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus $141,006 4 payments
  9. An Open-label, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics, Safety and Tolerability of Intravenous Secukinumab Infusion in Adults With Giant Cell Arteritis (GCA) or Polymyalgia Rheumatica (PMR) $117,198 2 payments
  10. A 54 Week Treatment, Multicenter, Randomized, Double Blind, Double Dummy, Placebo and Active Controlled, Parallel Group Phase 2 Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Brazikumab in Participants with Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis $62,718 3 payments
What the money was spent on Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Other $1,153 17 payments

Only reported on some payments, and a payment can report more than one category, so these amounts overlap.

What you are looking at

A noncovered recipient is an organisation paid for research that is neither an individual clinician nor a teaching hospital — typically a contract research organisation, a foundation or a trial site network. They receive 81% of all reported research money, which is why they appear here at all.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record