Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Zubin Batlivala

Pain Medicine Bedford, NH Medical Doctor

NPI 1710971957 CMS profile 78347

4 Hawthorne Dr, Suite 2, Bedford, NH 03110

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$18,122

116 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Zubin Batlivala of Bedford, NH is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $18,122 across 116 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 93rd percentile of Pain Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $516 20
2024 General $8,271 34
2023 General $8,536 23
2022 General $251 13
2021 General $289 12
2020 General $45 2
2019 General $215 12

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Zubin Batlivala
  • Pain Medicine median
  • Middle half of Pain Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Zubin Batlivala were reported at $516. Among 1,144 Pain Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $402 and the middle half received between $130 and $1,173.

Show as a table
Year Zubin Batlivala Pain Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $215 $409 $115–$1,311 $163
2020 $45 $214 $66–$666 $114
2021 $289 $299 $84–$899 $132
2022 $251 $335 $103–$1,149 $149
2023 $8,536 $376 $114–$1,228 $160
2024 $8,271 $387 $115–$1,173 $164
2025 $516 $402 $130–$1,173 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $17,433 85 payments
  2. Allergan Inc. $178 7 payments
  3. Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. $163 8 payments
  4. Scilex Pharmaceuticals Inc. $100 5 payments
  5. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $77 4 payments
  6. Galderma Laboratories, L.P. $72 1 payment
  7. Abbott Laboratories $25 1 payment
  8. Lilly USA, LLC $23 2 payments
  9. Nevro Corp. $19 1 payment
  10. Valinor Pharma, LLC $17 1 payment
  11. Other $14 1 payment

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $16,047 16 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $2,050 97 payments
  3. Education $25 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. UBRELVY $650 32 payments
  2. QULIPTA $507 22 payments
  3. BOTOX Botox Therapeutic $181 7 payments
  4. XTAMPZA $107 5 payments
  5. ZTLido 30 POUCH in 1 CARTON 1 PATCH in 1 POUCH $100 5 payments
  6. AIMOVIG $77 4 payments
  7. BOTOX Hyperhydrosis $57 4 payments
  8. BELBUCA $56 3 payments
  9. BOTOX Facial Aesthetics $32 3 payments
  10. PROCLAIM $25 1 payment
  11. Other $73 5 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 203 drugs

Part D claims

20,387

Median for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation: 276

Drug cost

$1,169,832

Median for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation: $5,921

Branded share of claims

19.1%

Median for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation: 11.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 565 $162,488
Ingrezza Valbenazine Tosylate Brand 29 $107,856
Invega Sustenna Paliperidone Palmitate Brand 28 $103,239
Xtampza Er Oxycodone Myristate Brand 102 $74,054
Retacrit Epoetin Alfa-Epbx Brand 88 $41,947
Oxycodone Hcl Generic 1,337 $34,502
Myrbetriq Mirabegron Brand 113 $26,076
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 76 $20,765
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 29 $20,347
Gabapentin Generic 1,293 $19,070

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 203 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 7,591 Part D prescribers listed as Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 63 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$223,209

Of which drugs: $3,602

Medicare patients

737

Average age 75

Services billed

4,037

462 women, 275 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Arthritis 75%
High blood pressure 73%
Depression 40%
Diabetes 29%
Alzheimer's or dementia 28%
Ischemic heart disease 25%
Chronic kidney disease 24%
COPD 22%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 80 mg J1040 Office 23 23 $131
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 48 141 $15

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

5 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
QULIPTA
  • AbbVie, Inc. $237
$237 — —
UBRELVY
  • AbbVie, Inc. $154
$154 — —
BOTOX
  • AbbVie, Inc. $94
$94 — —
BELBUCA
  • Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. $41
$41 — —
XTAMPZA
  • Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. $40
$40 102 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

116 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Pain Medicine in New Hampshire

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record