Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Zihe Shan

Internal Medicine Brooklyn, NY Medical Doctor

NPI 1982662458 CMS profile 271966

1508 Avenue U, Brooklyn, NY 11229

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$26,587

1,314 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Zihe Shan of Brooklyn, NY is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $26,587 across 1,314 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $3,370 152
2024 General $3,470 176
2023 General $3,696 184
2022 General $3,843 196
2021 General $3,830 190
2020 General $3,388 176
2019 General $4,990 240

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Zihe Shan
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Zihe Shan were reported at $3,370. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Zihe Shan Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $4,990 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $3,388 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $3,830 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $3,843 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $3,696 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $3,470 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $3,370 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $4,263 185 payments
  2. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $3,995 213 payments
  3. Amarin Pharma Inc. $2,075 113 payments
  4. Gilead Sciences, Inc. $1,763 69 payments
  5. Lilly USA, LLC $1,575 84 payments
  6. Amgen Inc. $1,511 62 payments
  7. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,365 92 payments
  8. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $1,150 39 payments
  9. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $990 58 payments
  10. AbbVie, Inc. $870 32 payments
  11. Other $7,030 367 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $26,439 1,299 payments
  2. Education $149 15 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. JARDIANCE Diabetes $2,933 118 payments
  2. FARXIGA $2,300 120 payments
  3. Vascepa Cardiovascular $1,327 67 payments
  4. Ozempic $1,176 76 payments
  5. RYBELSUS $1,155 75 payments
  6. JARDIANCE Diabetes $923 51 payments
  7. Kerendia $818 33 payments
  8. Vascepa Hypertriglyceridemia $748 46 payments
  9. EVENITY $691 26 payments
  10. BREZTRI $678 37 payments
  11. Other $18,581 962 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 190 drugs

Part D claims

26,940

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$5,769,760

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

30.5%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 673 $755,653
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 687 $705,959
Rybelsus Semaglutide Brand 297 $540,503
Vascepa Icosapent Ethyl Brand 590 $374,090
Vemlidy Tenofovir Alafenamide Brand 237 $348,897
Kerendia Finerenone Brand 330 $324,747
Tradjenta Linagliptin Brand 310 $283,887
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 256 $273,511
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 257 $269,040
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 242 $266,117

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 190 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 56 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$124,470

Of which drugs: $11,401

Medicare patients

158

Average age 79

Services billed

2,381

88 women, 70 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Chronic kidney disease 49%
Diabetes 45%
Ischemic heart disease 34%
Arthritis 32%
Osteoporosis 25%
Alzheimer's or dementia 20%
Heart failure 18%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Sarscv2 vac 30mcg trs-suc im 91320 Office 37 41 $6,045
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 51 52 $4,245
Vaccine for influenza for administration into muscle, 0.5 ml dosage 90656 Office 17 17 $372

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 28 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
AIRSUPRA
$427 — —
JARDIANCE
$390 687 —
FARXIGA
$380 673 —
SHINGRIX
$198 53 —
Kerendia
$184 330 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 28 with Patron

Records

1,314 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in New York

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record