Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Zhigang Yang

General Practice New York, NY Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1528345394 CMS profile 69495

55-59 Chrystie St, B104, New York, NY 10002

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$8,920

310 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$16

Paid to them · 1 record reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Zhigang Yang of New York, NY is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $8,920 across 310 general payments and $16 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 96th percentile of General Practice profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

8 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,782 56
2024 General $1,790 57
2023 General $1,221 38
2022 General $610 16
2021 General $1,458 74
2021 Research $16 1
2020 General $505 31
2019 General $1,553 38

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Zhigang Yang
  • General Practice median
  • Middle half of General Practice
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Zhigang Yang were reported at $1,782. Among 4,774 General Practice profiles paid that year, the median was $106 and the middle half received between $35 and $292.

Show as a table
Year Zhigang Yang General Practice median Middle half National median
2019 $1,553 $107 $37–$285 $163
2020 $505 $75 $25–$213 $114
2021 $1,458 $93 $30–$272 $132
2022 $610 $103 $36–$279 $149
2023 $1,221 $106 $34–$276 $160
2024 $1,790 $114 $39–$290 $164
2025 $1,782 $106 $35–$292 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $1,669 81 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $883 28 payments
  3. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $693 27 payments
  4. Amgen Inc. $686 31 payments
  5. Esperion Therapeutics, Inc. $610 12 payments
  6. Amarin Pharma Inc. $578 26 payments
  7. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $515 12 payments
  8. Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc $443 23 payments
  9. SPR Therapeutics, Inc $403 4 payments
  10. Allergan Inc. $297 5 payments
  11. Other $2,144 61 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $8,885 309 payments
  2. Education $35 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. XIFAXAN $1,573 80 payments
  2. CREON $792 24 payments
  3. TRULANCE $632 37 payments
  4. NEXLETOL $610 12 payments
  5. Vascepa $453 25 payments
  6. NEXLIZET $443 3 payments
  7. Linzess $443 23 payments
  8. SPRINT PNS System $403 4 payments
  9. AIRSUPRA $369 4 payments
  10. EVENITY $332 18 payments
  11. Other $5,522 219 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Saluda Medical Americas, Inc. $16 1 payment

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 167 drugs

Part D claims

15,857

Median for General Practice: 1,105

Drug cost

$2,198,441

Median for General Practice: $48,734

Branded share of claims

27.4%

Median for General Practice: 17.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Vascepa Icosapent Ethyl Brand 949 $423,568
Diclofenac Epolamine Generic 450 $256,018
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 215 $116,911
Diclofenac Sodium Generic 220 $108,240
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 147 $99,657
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 104 $65,819
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 90 $58,494
Abrysvo Rsv Vacc, Pref A And Pref B/Pf Brand 197 $55,898
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 78 $52,330
Breztri Aerosphere Budesonide/Glycopyr/Formoterol Brand 78 $52,238

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 167 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 7,210 Part D prescribers listed as General Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 33 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$23,753

Of which drugs: $2,379

Medicare patients

44

Average age 71

Services billed

1,418

20 women, 24 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 57%
Diabetes 41%
Arthritis 34%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 16 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
XIFAXAN
  • Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $284
$284 20 —
AREXVY
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $218
$218 16 —
CREON
  • AbbVie, Inc. $183
$183 56 —
LINZESS
  • Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc $111
  • AbbVie, Inc. $58
$169 215 —
AIRSUPRA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $140
$140 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 16 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

311 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record